32 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22212911)
1. Clinical characteristics of hepatoduodenal lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.
Imamura T; Komatsu S; Ichikawa D; Kosuga T; Okamoto K; Konishi H; Shiozaki A; Fujiwara H; Otsuji E
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(38):10866-73. PubMed ID: 26478677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Number of metastasis-positive lymph node stations is a simple and reliable prognostic factor following surgery in patients with esophageal cancer.
Takeno S; Yamashita SI; Yamamoto S; Takahashi Y; Moroga T; Kawahara K; Shiroshita T; Yamana I; Maki K; Yamashita Y
Exp Ther Med; 2012 Dec; 4(6):1087-1091. PubMed ID: 23226779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retrieved lymph nodes from different anatomic groups in gastric cancer: a proposed optimal number, comparison with other nodal classification strategies and its impact on prognosis.
Pan S; Wang P; Xing Y; Li K; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhu Z
Cancer Commun (Lond); 2019 Sep; 39(1):49. PubMed ID: 31519217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A new pN staging system based on both the number and anatomic location of metastatic lymph nodes in gastric cancer.
Chen J; Chen C; He Y; Wu K; Wu H; Cai S
J Gastrointest Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(12):2080-8. PubMed ID: 25297445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Splenic hilar lymph node metastasis independently predicts poor survival for patients with gastric cancers in the upper and/or the middle third of the stomach.
Zhu GL; Sun Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Zhu Z; Xu HM
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):786-92. PubMed ID: 22105768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of tumor deposits in gastric cancer patients who underwent radical surgery.
Sun Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Zhu GL; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Liu FN; Zhu Z; Xu HM
Surgery; 2012 Jun; 151(6):871-81. PubMed ID: 22386276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer after curative resection (R0) regardless of the examined number of lymph nodes.
Alatengbaolide ; Lin D; Li Y; Xu H; Chen J; Wang B; Liu C; Lu P
Am J Clin Oncol; 2013 Aug; 36(4):325-30. PubMed ID: 22547011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The prognostic value of N-ratio in patients with gastric cancer: validation in a large, multicenter series.
Marchet A; Mocellin S; Ambrosi A; de Manzoni G; Di Leo A; Marrelli D; Roviello F; Morgagni P; Saragoni L; Natalini G; De Santis F; Baiocchi L; Coniglio A; Nitti D;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2008 Feb; 34(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 17566691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic significance of level and number of lymph node metastases in patients with gastric cancer.
Saito H; Fukumoto Y; Osaki T; Fukuda K; Tatebe S; Tsujitani S; Ikeguchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 May; 14(5):1688-93. PubMed ID: 17245613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prognostic significance of lymph node station 7 for patients with gastric cancers underwent radical surgery.
Tong JH; Sun Z; Zhu Z; Wang ZN; Xu YY; Huang BJ; Xu Y; Xu HM
J Surg Oncol; 2012 Jun; 105(8):805-12. PubMed ID: 22212911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Nigri G; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Ruzzetti R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
