These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22213023)

  • 1. Effects of neuroimaging evidence on mock juror decision making.
    Greene E; Cahill BS
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):280-96. PubMed ID: 22213023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Examining the prevalence, role and impact of evidence regarding Antisocial Personality, sociopathy and psychopathy in capital cases: a survey of defense team members.
    Edens JF; Cox J
    Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):239-55. PubMed ID: 22374708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Defendant remorse, need for affect, and juror sentencing decisions.
    Corwin EP; Cramer RJ; Griffin DA; Brodsky SL
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22396340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Juror Decision-making in Death Penalty Sentencing when Presented with Defendant's History of Child Abuse or Neglect.
    Bell Holleran LL; Vaughan TJ; Vandiver DM
    Behav Sci Law; 2016 Nov; 34(6):742-766. PubMed ID: 28098410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How type of excuse defense, mock juror age, and defendant age affect mock jurors' decisions.
    Higgins PL; Heath WP; Grannemann BD
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Aug; 147(4):371-92. PubMed ID: 17955749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Capital jury deliberation: effects on death sentencing, comprehension, and discrimination.
    Lynch M; Haney C
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Dec; 33(6):481-96. PubMed ID: 19333746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of the Psychopathy Checklist--Revised in capital cases: mock jurors' responses to the label of psychopathy.
    Cox J; DeMatteo DS; Foster EE
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):878-91. PubMed ID: 20824653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Jurors' locus of control and defendants' attractiveness in death penalty sentencing.
    Beckham CM; Spray BJ; Pietz CA
    J Soc Psychol; 2007 Jun; 147(3):285-98. PubMed ID: 17703790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When mitigation evidence makes a difference: effects of psychological mitigating evidence on sentencing decisions in capital trials.
    Barnett ME; Brodsky SL; Davis CM
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):751-70. PubMed ID: 15386561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroimage evidence and the insanity defense.
    Schweitzer NJ; Saks MJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(4):592-607. PubMed ID: 21744379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gender, Generations, and Guilt: Defendant Gender and Age Affect Jurors' Decisions and Perceptions in an Intimate Partner Homicide Trial.
    Ruva CL; Smith KD; Sykes EC
    J Interpers Violence; 2023 Dec; 38(23-24):12089-12112. PubMed ID: 37602736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gruesome evidence and emotion: anger, blame, and jury decision-making.
    Bright DA; Goodman-Delahunty J
    Law Hum Behav; 2006 Apr; 30(2):183-202. PubMed ID: 16786406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Commentary: Perception of remorse by mock jurors in a capital murder trial.
    Batista LM; Myers W
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2012; 40(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 22396342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Town vs. gown: a direct comparison of community residents and student mock jurors.
    Hosch HM; Culhane SE; Tubb VA; Granillo EA
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):452-66. PubMed ID: 21351133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. "Dr. Death" and the case for an ethical ban on psychiatric and psychological predictions of dangerousness in capital sentencing proceedings.
    Ewing CP
    Am J Law Med; 1983; 8(4):407-28. PubMed ID: 6859049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What are we studying? Student jurors, community jurors, and construct validity.
    Keller SR; Wiener RL
    Behav Sci Law; 2011; 29(3):376-94. PubMed ID: 21766327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relations among mock jurors' attitudes, trial evidence, and their selections of an insanity defense verdict: a path analytic approach.
    Poulson RL; Brondino MJ; Brown H; Braithwaite RL
    Psychol Rep; 1998 Feb; 82(1):3-16. PubMed ID: 9520530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arbitrariness and the death penalty: how the defendant's appearance during trial influences capital jurors' punishment decision.
    Antonio ME
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):215-34. PubMed ID: 16557640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.