BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22213262)

  • 1. Evaluating performance of local case-mix system by international comparison: a case study in Beijing, China.
    Jian WY; Lu M; Cui T; Hu M
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2011; 26(4):471-81. PubMed ID: 22213262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The pilot results of 47 148 cases of BJ-DRGs-based payment in China.
    Zeng JQ
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2019 Oct; 34(4):1386-1398. PubMed ID: 31286577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Describing Iranian hospital activity using Australian Refined DRGs: a case study of the Iranian Social Security Organisation.
    Ghaffari S; Jackson TJ; Doran CM; Wilson A; Aisbett C
    Health Policy; 2008 Jul; 87(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 17980930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structure and performance of different DRG classification systems for neonatal medicine.
    Muldoon JH
    Pediatrics; 1999 Jan; 103(1 Suppl E):302-18. PubMed ID: 9917473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Case-mix adjustment using objective measures of severity: the case for laboratory data.
    Mozes B; Easterling MJ; Sheiner LB; Melmon KL; Kline R; Goldman ES; Brown AN
    Health Serv Res; 1994 Feb; 28(6):689-712. PubMed ID: 8113053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical redesign using all patient refined diagnosis related groups.
    Sedman AB; Bahl V; Bunting E; Bandy K; Jones S; Nasr SZ; Schulz K; Campbell DA
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):965-9. PubMed ID: 15466092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing diagnosis-related groups: is the information system ready?
    Jian W; Lu M; Han W; Hu M
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2016; 31(1):E58-68. PubMed ID: 25111893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Medicare program; changes to the hospital inpatient prospective payment systems and fiscal year 2007 rates; fiscal year 2007 occupational mix adjustment to wage index; health care infrastructure improvement program; selection criteria of loan program for qualifying hospitals engaged in cancer-related health care and forgiveness of indebtedness; and exclusion of vendor purchases made under the competitive acquisition program (CAP) for outpatient drugs and biologicals under part B for the purpose of calculating the average sales price (ASP). Final rules and interim final rule with comment period.
    Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS
    Fed Regist; 2006 Aug; 71(160):47869-8351. PubMed ID: 16921666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relevance of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Safety Indicators for children's hospitals.
    Sedman A; Harris JM; Schulz K; Schwalenstocker E; Remus D; Scanlon M; Bahl V
    Pediatrics; 2005 Jan; 115(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 15579669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cluster approach allows budgeting, planning with DRGs.
    Grimaldi PL
    Hosp Prog; 1984; 65(7):73-9. PubMed ID: 10310693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [DRGs in psychiatric hospital financing exemplified by Hungary. A model for Germany?].
    Maylath E
    Gesundheitswesen; 2000 Dec; 62(12):633-45. PubMed ID: 11199199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Case mix measures and diagnosis-related groups: opportunities and threats for inpatient dermatology.
    Hensen P; Fürstenberg T; Luger TA; Steinhoff M; Roeder N
    J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2005 Sep; 19(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 16164713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparing diagnosis-related group systems to identify design improvements.
    Reid B; Sutch S
    Health Policy; 2008 Jul; 87(1):82-91. PubMed ID: 18276032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility and validity of International Classification of Diseases based case mix indices.
    Yang CM; Reinke W
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2006 Oct; 6():125. PubMed ID: 17022827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].
    Giraldes Mdo R
    Acta Med Port; 2008; 21(5):397-410. PubMed ID: 19187682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Case-mix differences between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
    Goldfarb MG; Coffey RM
    Inquiry; 1987; 24(1):68-84. PubMed ID: 2951336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How nurses can survive under DRGs.
    Irurita VF
    Int Nurs Rev; 1987; 34(6):154-7. PubMed ID: 3121530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Revising diagnosis-related groups for neonates.
    Lichtig LK; Knauf RA; Bartoletti A; Wozniak LM; Gregg RH; Muldoon J; Ellis WC
    Pediatrics; 1989 Jul; 84(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 2500638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of flat-rate payment in radiation oncology. German experience with disease-related groups for inpatient funding in radiation oncology].
    Glocker S; Loskamp N; Bamberg M; Roeder N
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2006 Jun; 182(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 16703284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying the 3M All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups Grouper to measure inpatient severity in the VA.
    Shen Y
    Med Care; 2003 Jun; 41(6 Suppl):II103-10. PubMed ID: 12773832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.