177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22213551)
1. Quasi-static magnetic resonance elastography at 7 T to measure the effect of pathology before and after fixation on tissue biomechanical properties.
McGrath DM; Foltz WD; Al-Mayah A; Niu CJ; Brock KK
Magn Reson Med; 2012 Jul; 68(1):152-65. PubMed ID: 22213551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MR elastography to measure the effects of cancer and pathology fixation on prostate biomechanics, and comparison with T
McGrath DM; Lee J; Foltz WD; Samavati N; van der Kwast T; Jewett MA; Chung P; Ménard C; Brock KK
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 62(3):1126-1148. PubMed ID: 28092638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An inverse problem solution for measuring the elastic modulus of intact ex vivo breast tissue tumours.
Samani A; Plewes D
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1247-60. PubMed ID: 17301452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Parametric-based brain Magnetic Resonance Elastography using a Rayleigh damping material model.
Petrov AY; Sellier M; Docherty PD; Chase JG
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Oct; 116(3):328-39. PubMed ID: 24986109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring the elastic modulus of ex vivo small tissue samples.
Samani A; Bishop J; Luginbuhl C; Plewes DB
Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 48(14):2183-98. PubMed ID: 12894978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Model-based registration of ex vivo and in vivo MRI of the prostate using elastography*.
Nir G; Sahebjavaher RS; Kozlowski P; Chang SD; Sinkus R; Goldenberg SL; Salcudean SE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1349-61. PubMed ID: 23807814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High-resolution quantitative imaging of cornea elasticity using supersonic shear imaging.
Tanter M; Touboul D; Gennisson JL; Bercoff J; Fink M
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Dec; 28(12):1881-93. PubMed ID: 19423431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement and characterization of soft tissue behavior with surface deformation and force response under large deformations.
Ahn B; Kim J
Med Image Anal; 2010 Apr; 14(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 19948423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperineal prostate MR elastography: initial in vivo results.
Sahebjavaher RS; Baghani A; Honarvar M; Sinkus R; Salcudean SE
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Feb; 69(2):411-20. PubMed ID: 22505273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Model-based registration of ex vivo and in vivo MRI of the prostate using elastography.
Nir G; Sahebjavaher RS; Kozlowski P; Chang SD; Sinkus R
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Jun; 32(6):1068-80. PubMed ID: 23475353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurement of vibration-induced volumetric strain in the human lung.
Hirsch S; Posnansky O; Papazoglou S; Elgeti T; Braun J; Sack I
Magn Reson Med; 2013 Mar; 69(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 22529038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Elasticity reconstruction from displacement and confidence measures of a multi-compressed ultrasound RF sequence.
Li J; Cui Y; Kadour M; Noble JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Feb; 55(2):319-26. PubMed ID: 18334339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultrasonic strain imaging and reconstructive elastography for biological tissue.
Khaled W; Reichling S; Bruhns OT; Ermert H
Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e199-202. PubMed ID: 16857230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for characterization of tissue elastic properties combining ultrasonic computed tomography with elastography.
Glozman T; Azhari H
J Ultrasound Med; 2010 Mar; 29(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 20194935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. High-quality model generation for finite element simulation of tissue deformation.
Goksel O; Salcudean SE
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2009; 12(Pt 2):248-56. PubMed ID: 20426119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computational elastography from standard ultrasound image sequences by global trust region optimization.
Kybic J; Smutek D
Inf Process Med Imaging; 2005; 19():299-310. PubMed ID: 17354704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mesh adaptation for improving elasticity reconstruction using the FEM inverse problem.
Goksel O; Eskandari H; Salcudean SE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Feb; 32(2):408-18. PubMed ID: 23192522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and evaluation of an identification method for the biomechanical parameters using robotic force measurements, medical images, and FEA.
Hoshi T; Tsukune M; Kobayashi Y; Miyashita T; Fujie MG
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2011; 2011():5386-91. PubMed ID: 22255555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of nonrigid image registration using finite-element methods: application to breast MR images.
Schnabel JA; Tanner C; Castellano-Smith AD; Degenhard A; Leach MO; Hose DR; Hill DL; Hawkes DJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Feb; 22(2):238-47. PubMed ID: 12716000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ultrashort echo time magnetization transfer (UTE-MT) imaging of cortical bone.
Chang EY; Bae WC; Shao H; Biswas R; Li S; Chen J; Patil S; Healey R; D'Lima DD; Chung CB; Du J
NMR Biomed; 2015 Jul; 28(7):873-80. PubMed ID: 25981914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
