These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22213710)
1. Simultaneously mapping and superimposing landmark configurations with parsimony as optimality criterion. Catalano SA; Goloboff PA Syst Biol; 2012 May; 61(3):392-400. PubMed ID: 22213710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The more, the better: the use of multiple landmark configurations to solve the phylogenetic relationships in musteloids. Catalano SA; Ercoli MD; Prevosti FJ Syst Biol; 2015 Mar; 64(2):294-306. PubMed ID: 25516268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Towards improving searches for optimal phylogenies. Ford E; St John K; Wheeler WC Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25164916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments. Whelan S Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):727-40. PubMed ID: 17849327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geometric morphometrics, homology and cladistics: review and recommendations. Palci A; Lee MSY Cladistics; 2019 Apr; 35(2):230-242. PubMed ID: 34622971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing clustering results with reference taxonomies. Valiente G Genome Inform; 2006; 17(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 17503386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phylogenetic morphometrics (I): the use of landmark data in a phylogenetic framework. Catalano SA; Goloboff PA; Giannini NP Cladistics; 2010 Oct; 26(5):539-549. PubMed ID: 34875764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Kubatko LS; Degnan JH Syst Biol; 2007 Feb; 56(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 17366134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study. Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. von Cramon-Taubadel N; Frazier BC; Lahr MM Am J Phys Anthropol; 2007 Sep; 134(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 17503448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees. Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PASOS: a method for the phylogenetic analysis of shape ontogenies. Catalano SA; Segura V; Vera Candioti F Cladistics; 2019 Dec; 35(6):671-687. PubMed ID: 34618936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of mitogenomic information in teleostean molecular phylogenetics: a tree-based exploration under the maximum-parsimony optimality criterion. Miya M; Nishida M Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2000 Dec; 17(3):437-55. PubMed ID: 11133198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics]. Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. On the quality of tree-based protein classification. Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Estimating the phylogeny of geoemydid turtles (Cryptodira) from landmark data: an assessment of different methods. Ascarrunz E; Claude J; Joyce WG PeerJ; 2019; 7():e7476. PubMed ID: 31497387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Foundations of the new phylogenetics]. Pavlinov IIa Zh Obshch Biol; 2004; 65(4):334-66. PubMed ID: 15490579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]