These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22213894)

  • 1. What you learn is what you see: using eye movements to study infant cross-situational word learning.
    Yu C; Smith LB
    Dev Sci; 2011 Mar; 14(2):165-80. PubMed ID: 22213894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Selective attention in cross-situational statistical learning: evidence from eye tracking.
    Yu C; Zhong Y; Fricker D
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():148. PubMed ID: 22712020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Novel word learning: An eye-tracking study. Are 18-month-old late talkers really different from their typical peers?
    Ellis EM; Borovsky A; Elman JL; Evans JL
    J Commun Disord; 2015; 58():143-57. PubMed ID: 26188415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanisms of Cross-situational Learning: Behavioral and Computational Evidence.
    Zhang Y; Chen CH; Yu C
    Adv Child Dev Behav; 2019; 56():37-63. PubMed ID: 30846050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Real-time lexical comprehension in young children learning American Sign Language.
    MacDonald K; LaMarr T; Corina D; Marchman VA; Fernald A
    Dev Sci; 2018 Nov; 21(6):e12672. PubMed ID: 29659103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Memory constraints on infants' cross-situational statistical learning.
    Vlach HA; Johnson SP
    Cognition; 2013 Jun; 127(3):375-82. PubMed ID: 23545387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Observational Word Learning: Beyond Propose-But-Verify and Associative Bean Counting.
    Roembke T; McMurray B
    J Mem Lang; 2016 Apr; 87():105-127. PubMed ID: 26858510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eye movements reveal that young school children shift attention when solving additions and subtractions.
    Masson N; Dormal V; Stephany M; Schiltz C
    Dev Sci; 2024 Mar; 27(2):e13452. PubMed ID: 37800410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-generated variability in object images predicts vocabulary growth.
    Slone LK; Smith LB; Yu C
    Dev Sci; 2019 Nov; 22(6):e12816. PubMed ID: 30770597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms.
    LaTourrette A; Waxman SR
    J Vis Exp; 2019 Feb; (144):. PubMed ID: 30799862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modeling cross-situational word-referent learning: prior questions.
    Yu C; Smith LB
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):21-39. PubMed ID: 22229490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Visual attention is not enough: Individual differences in statistical word-referent learning in infants.
    Smith LB; Yu C
    Lang Learn Dev; 2013 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 24403867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The infant's view redefines the problem of referential uncertainty in early word learning.
    Yu C; Zhang Y; Slone LK; Smith LB
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Dec; 118(52):. PubMed ID: 34933998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dynamics of gaze control during prey capture in freely moving mice.
    Michaiel AM; Abe ET; Niell CM
    Elife; 2020 Jul; 9():. PubMed ID: 32706335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Classification of visual and linguistic tasks using eye-movement features.
    Coco MI; Keller F
    J Vis; 2014 Mar; 14(3):11. PubMed ID: 24610954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infant sustained attention but not joint attention to objects at 9 months predicts vocabulary at 12 and 15 months.
    Yu C; Suanda SH; Smith LB
    Dev Sci; 2019 Jan; 22(1):e12735. PubMed ID: 30255968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Propose but verify: fast mapping meets cross-situational word learning.
    Trueswell JC; Medina TN; Hafri A; Gleitman LR
    Cogn Psychol; 2013 Feb; 66(1):126-56. PubMed ID: 23142693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-situational Learning From Ambiguous Egocentric Input Is a Continuous Process: Evidence Using the Human Simulation Paradigm.
    Zhang Y; Yurovsky D; Yu C
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Jul; 45(7):e13010. PubMed ID: 34213788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Learning rational temporal eye movement strategies.
    Hoppe D; Rothkopf CA
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jul; 113(29):8332-7. PubMed ID: 27382164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics.
    Yu C; Smith LB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 May; 18(5):414-20. PubMed ID: 17576281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.