These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214435)

  • 1. Reasons for replacement of restorations: dentists' perceptions.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2012 Dec; 70(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 22214435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Finnish dentists' perceptions of the longevity of direct dental restorations.
    Palotie U; Vehkalahti MM
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 19039686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Repair of defective composite restorations. A questionnaire study among dentists in the Public Dental Service in Norway.
    Staxrud F; Tveit AB; Rukke HV; Kopperud SE
    J Dent; 2016 Sep; 52():50-4. PubMed ID: 27421988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Placement and replacement of restorations in a military population.
    MacInnis WA; Ismail A; Brogan H
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1991 Mar; 57(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 2043998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-treatment decisions for failed posterior fillings by Finnish general practitioners.
    Heinikainen M; Vehkalahti M; Murtomaa H
    Community Dent Health; 2002 Jun; 19(2):98-103. PubMed ID: 12146589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dental practitioners' experiences on the usefulness of restorative materials in Finland 1992-1996.
    Widström E; Forss H
    Br Dent J; 1998 Nov; 185(10):540-2. PubMed ID: 9874887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attitudes of dentists and interns in Riyadh to the use of dental amalgam.
    Alkhudhairy F
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Nov; 9(1):488. PubMed ID: 27855718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Placement and replacement of restorations in general dental practice in Iceland.
    Mjör IA; Shen C; Eliasson ST; Richter S
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 11931133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reasons for replacement of Class II amalgam restorations in private practice.
    Allander L; Birkhed D; Bratthall D
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 2255996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients.
    Vidnes-Kopperud S; Tveit AB; Gaarden T; Sandvik L; Espelid I
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2009; 67(2):74-9. PubMed ID: 19085213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems associated with restorative materials--dentists' views in Finland and Sweden.
    Widström E; Sundberg H
    Swed Dent J; 1991; 15(4):153-60. PubMed ID: 1957249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Survey of general dentists regarding posterior restorations, selection criteria, and associated clinical problems.
    Haj-Ali R; Walker MP; Williams K
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(5):369-75; quiz 376, 367-8. PubMed ID: 16252541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps.
    York AK; Arthur JS
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 8152990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Removal, replacement and placement of amalgam restorations by Ontario dentists in 2002.
    Adegbembo AO; Watson PA
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2005 Sep; 71(8):565. PubMed ID: 16202194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Agreement among dentists' restorative treatment planning thresholds for primary occlusal caries, primary proximal caries, and existing restorations: findings from The National Dental Practice-Based Research Network.
    Heaven TJ; Gordan VV; Litaker MS; Fellows JL; Brad Rindal D; Firestone AR; Gilbert GH;
    J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):718-25. PubMed ID: 23743181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reasons for restoration replacement: differences in practice patterns.
    Drake CW; Maryniuk GA; Bentley C
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Feb; 21(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 2374800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Replacement of resin-based composite restorations in permanent teeth.
    Asghar S; Ali A; Rashid S; Hussain T
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2010 Oct; 20(10):639-43. PubMed ID: 20943103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom.
    Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
    Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
    J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dentists' and parents' perceptions of health, esthetics, and treatment of maxillary primary incisors.
    Woo D; Sheller B; Williams B; Mancl L; Grembowski D
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15839390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.