300 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214685)
1. Quantitative evaluation of microvascular blood flow by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):137-49. PubMed ID: 22214685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound contrast agents as markers of vascularity and microcirculation.
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2009; 43(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 19713597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro evaluation of the impact of ultrasound scanner settings and contrast bolus volume on time-intensity curves.
Gauthier TP; Chebil M; Peronneau P; Lassau N
Ultrasonics; 2012 Jan; 52(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 21722933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Renal blood flow quantification in pigs using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: an ex vivo study.
Hoeffel C; Mulé S; Huwart L; Frouin F; Jais JP; Helenon O; Correas JM
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Aug; 31(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 20408121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography in rat: infusion versus bolus administration.
Su HL; Qian YQ; Wei ZR; He JG; Li GQ; Zhang J; Zhou XD; Jing W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 May; 35(5):748-55. PubMed ID: 19410132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using real-time contrast harmonic imaging in invasive breast cancer: comparison of enhancement dynamics with three different doses of contrast agent.
Saracco A; Szabó BK; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Tánczos E; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jan; 56(1):34-41. PubMed ID: 24445092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantification of flow using ultrasound and microbubbles: a disruption replenishment model based on physical principles.
Hudson JM; Karshafian R; Burns PN
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Dec; 35(12):2007-20. PubMed ID: 19822390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
Wacker CM; Bauer WR
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [MR-Imaging of lower leg muscle perfusion].
Leppek R; Hoos O; Sattler A; Kohle S; Azzam S; Al Haffar I; Keil B; Ricken P; Klose KJ; Alfke H
Herz; 2004 Feb; 29(1):32-46. PubMed ID: 14968340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantification of hepatic parenchymal blood flow by contrast ultrasonography with flash-replenishment imaging.
Metoki R; Moriyasu F; Kamiyama N; Sugimoto K; Iijima H; Xu HX; Aoki T; Miyata Y; Yamamoto K; Kudo K; Shimizu M; Yamada M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Oct; 32(10):1459-66. PubMed ID: 17045864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the follow up after EVAR by using ultrasound image fusion of CEUS and MS-CT.
Clevert DA; Helck A; D'Anastasi M; Gürtler V; Sommer WH; Meimarakis G; Weidenhagen R; Reiser M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2011; 49(1-4):91-104. PubMed ID: 22214681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bolus compared with continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent using real-time contrast harmonic imaging ultrasound in breast tumors.
Saracco A; Aspelin P; Leifland K; Themudo R; Wilczek B; Axelsson R
Acta Radiol; 2009 Oct; 50(8):854-9. PubMed ID: 19634024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microvascular flow estimation by microbubble-assisted Nakagami imaging.
Tsui PH; Yeh CK; Chang CC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 35(4):653-71. PubMed ID: 19097684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of the ovine corpus luteum microcirculation with contrast ultrasound.
Sboros V; Averkiou M; Lampaskis M; Thomas DH; Silva N; Strouthos C; Docherty J; McNeilly AS
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jan; 37(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 21144958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Modeling ultrasound contrast measurement of blood flow and perfusion in biological tissue.
Thijssen JM; de Korte CL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Feb; 31(2):279-85. PubMed ID: 15708468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real time myocardial contrast echocardiography during supine bicycle stress and continuous infusion of contrast agent. Cutoff values for myocardial contrast replenishment discriminating abnormal myocardial perfusion.
Miszalski-Jamka T; Kuntz-Hehner S; Schmidt H; Hammerstingl C; Tiemann K; Ghanem A; Troatz C; Lüderitz B; Omran H
Echocardiography; 2007 Jul; 24(6):638-48. PubMed ID: 17584204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound using bolus injections of contrast agent for assessment of postprandial microvascular blood volume in human skeletal muscle.
Mertz KH; Bülow J; Holm L
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2018 Sep; 38(5):864-871. PubMed ID: 29282853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbubbles as a novel contrast agent for brain MRI.
Cheung JS; Chow AM; Guo H; Wu EX
Neuroimage; 2009 Jul; 46(3):658-64. PubMed ID: 19269337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intrahepatic transit time predicts liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B: quantitative assessment with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.
Li N; Ding H; Fan P; Lin X; Xu C; Wang W; Xu Z; Wang J
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):1066-75. PubMed ID: 20620694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A simple method for quantifying ultrasound-triggered microbubble destruction.
Hung SH; Yeh CK; Tsai TH; Chen T; Chen RC
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):949-57. PubMed ID: 21546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
