301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214685)
21. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Color Coded Perfusion Imaging with Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for Post-Interventional Success Control Following Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) of Primary and Secondary Malignant Liver Lesions.
Rennert J; Wiesinger I; Schicho A; Wiggermann P; Stroszczynski C; Beyer LP; Jung EM
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2019 Sep; 28(3):311-318. PubMed ID: 31517328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Quantitative Differences Between the First and Second Injection of Contrast Agent in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography of Feline Kidneys and Spleen.
Stock E; Vanderperren K; Haers H; Duchateau L; Hesta M; Saunders JH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Feb; 43(2):500-504. PubMed ID: 27746009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of peripheral skeletal muscle microperfusion in a porcine model of peripheral arterial stenosis by steady-state contrast-enhanced ultrasound and Doppler flow measurement.
Naehle CP; Steinberg VA; Schild H; Mommertz G
J Vasc Surg; 2015 May; 61(5):1312-20. PubMed ID: 24418637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Microvascular flow estimation by contrast-assisted ultrasound B-scan and statistical parametric images.
Tsui PH; Yeh CK; Chang CC
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2009 May; 13(3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19174355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Investigation of the relationship of nonlinear backscattered ultrasound intensity with microbubble concentration at low MI.
Lampaskis M; Averkiou M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 36(2):306-12. PubMed ID: 20045592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Flow quantification with nakagami parametric imaging for suppressing contrast microbubbles attenuation.
Gu X; Wei M; Zong Y; Jiang H; Wan M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 39(4):660-9. PubMed ID: 23384469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Technical aspects of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) examinations: tips and tricks.
Greis C
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2014; 58(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 25227188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview.
Cosgrove D
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):324-30. PubMed ID: 16938418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perfusion quantification in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)--ready for research projects and routine clinical use.
Tranquart F; Mercier L; Frinking P; Gaud E; Arditi M
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jul; 33 Suppl 1():S31-8. PubMed ID: 22723027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An EFSUMB introduction into Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (DCE-US) for quantification of tumour perfusion.
Dietrich CF; Averkiou MA; Correas JM; Lassau N; Leen E; Piscaglia F
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):344-51. PubMed ID: 22843433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Quantification of renal blood flow with contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Wei K; Le E; Bin JP; Coggins M; Thorpe J; Kaul S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2001 Mar; 37(4):1135-40. PubMed ID: 11263620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound determination of microvascular blood volume in abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue in man. Evidence for adipose tissue capillary recruitment.
Tobin L; Simonsen L; Bülow J
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2010 Nov; 30(6):447-52. PubMed ID: 20731685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Assessment of tissue perfusion by contrast-enhanced ultrasound.
Quaia E
Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):604-15. PubMed ID: 20927527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Bolus versus continuous infusion of microbubble contrast agent for liver ultrasound by using an automatic power injector in humans: A pilot study.
Quaia E; Gennari AG; Angileri R; Cova MA
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016; 44(3):136-42. PubMed ID: 26302446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Echo-power estimation from log-compressed video data in dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.
Payen T; Coron A; Lamuraglia M; Le Guillou-Buffello D; Gaud E; Arditi M; Lucidarme O; Bridal SL
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1826-37. PubMed ID: 23879926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Assessment of renal perfusion with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Preliminary results in early diabetic nephropathies.
Dong Y; Wang WP; Lin P; Fan P; Mao F
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2016; 62(3):229-38. PubMed ID: 26444598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. High-resolution ultrasound perfusion imaging of therapeutic angiogenesis.
Rissanen TT; Korpisalo P; Karvinen H; Liimatainen T; Laidinen S; Gröhn OH; Ylä-Herttuala S
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2008 Jan; 1(1):83-91. PubMed ID: 19356410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On the design of a capillary flow phantom for the evaluation of ultrasound contrast agents at very low flow velocities.
Veltmann C; Lohmaier S; Schlosser T; Shai S; Ehlgen A; Pohl C; Becher H; Tiemann K
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 May; 28(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12079699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison between preoperative quantitative assessment of bowel wall vascularization by contrast-enhanced ultrasound and operative macroscopic findings and results of histopathological scoring in Crohn's disease.
Girlich C; Jung EM; Huber E; Ott C; Iesalnieks I; Schreyer A; Schacherer D
Ultraschall Med; 2011 Apr; 32(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 20449794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
