977 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214754)
1. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sources of evidence for systematic reviews of interventions in diabetes.
Royle PL; Bain L; Waugh NR
Diabet Med; 2005 Oct; 22(10):1386-93. PubMed ID: 16176201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reporting Bias in Clinical Trials Investigating the Efficacy of Second-Generation Antidepressants in the Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: A Report of 2 Meta-analyses.
Roest AM; de Jonge P; Williams CD; de Vries YA; Schoevers RA; Turner EH
JAMA Psychiatry; 2015 May; 72(5):500-10. PubMed ID: 25806940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Searching for unpublished trials in Cochrane reviews may not be worth the effort.
van Driel ML; De Sutter A; De Maeseneer J; Christiaens T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Aug; 62(8):838-844.e3. PubMed ID: 19128939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methodologic issues in systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Montori VM; Swiontkowski MF; Cook DJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Aug; (413):43-54. PubMed ID: 12897595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can we rely on the best trial? A comparison of individual trials and systematic reviews.
Glasziou PP; Shepperd S; Brassey J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():23. PubMed ID: 20298582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insomnia medication: do published studies reflect the complete picture of efficacy and safety?
Mattila T; Stoyanova V; Elferink A; Gispen-de Wied C; de Boer A; Wohlfarth T
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2011 Jul; 21(7):500-7. PubMed ID: 21084176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adjusting for publication biases across similar interventions performed well when compared with gold standard data.
Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Ades AE; Cooper NJ; Abrams KR
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1230-41. PubMed ID: 21530169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: an independent appraisal.
Delaney A; Bagshaw SM; Ferland A; Laupland K; Manns B; Doig C
Crit Care Med; 2007 Feb; 35(2):589-94. PubMed ID: 17205029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Magnitude of effects in clinical trials published in high-impact general medical journals.
Siontis KC; Evangelou E; Ioannidis JP
Int J Epidemiol; 2011 Oct; 40(5):1280-91. PubMed ID: 22039194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Single-center trials show larger treatment effects than multicenter trials: evidence from a meta-epidemiologic study.
Dechartres A; Boutron I; Trinquart L; Charles P; Ravaud P
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):39-51. PubMed ID: 21727292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Publication bias in psychological science: prevalence, methods for identifying and controlling, and implications for the use of meta-analyses.
Ferguson CJ; Brannick MT
Psychol Methods; 2012 Mar; 17(1):120-8. PubMed ID: 21787082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Publication of clinical trials supporting successful new drug applications: a literature analysis.
Lee K; Bacchetti P; Sim I
PLoS Med; 2008 Sep; 5(9):e191. PubMed ID: 18816163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Selective reporting in trials of high risk cardiovascular devices: cross sectional comparison between premarket approval summaries and published reports.
Chang L; Dhruva SS; Chu J; Bero LA; Redberg RF
BMJ; 2015 Jun; 350():h2613. PubMed ID: 26063311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A methodological review of recent meta-analyses has found significant heterogeneity in age between randomized groups.
Clark L; Fairhurst C; Hewitt CE; Birks Y; Brabyn S; Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Hicks K; Hodgson R; Littlewood E; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 67(9):1016-24. PubMed ID: 24909873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
