221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214759)
1. Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications.
Wieseler B; Kerekes MF; Vervoelgyi V; McGauran N; Kaiser T
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d8141. PubMed ID: 22214759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports.
Köhler M; Haag S; Biester K; Brockhaus AC; McGauran N; Grouven U; Kölsch H; Seay U; Hörn H; Moritz G; Staeck K; Wieseler B
BMJ; 2015 Feb; 350():h796. PubMed ID: 25722024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting of methods was better in the Clinical Trials Registry-India than in Indian journal publications.
Tharyan P; George AT; Kirubakaran R; Barnabas JP
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):10-22. PubMed ID: 22459428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Registration status and outcome reporting of trials published in core headache medicine journals.
Rayhill ML; Sharon R; Burch R; Loder E
Neurology; 2015 Nov; 85(20):1789-94. PubMed ID: 26475691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does a "Level I Evidence" rating imply high quality of reporting in orthopaedic randomised controlled trials?
Poolman RW; Struijs PA; Krips R; Sierevelt IN; Lutz KH; Bhandari M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Sep; 6():44. PubMed ID: 16965628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. For randomized controlled trials, the quality of reports of complementary and alternative medicine was as good as reports of conventional medicine.
Klassen TP; Pham B; Lawson ML; Moher D
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Aug; 58(8):763-8. PubMed ID: 16018911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes to registration elements and results in a cohort of Clinicaltrials.gov trials were not reflected in published articles.
Pranić S; Marušić A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Feb; 70():26-37. PubMed ID: 26226103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of reporting and outcome measures in randomized clinical trials related to upper-extremity disorders.
Gummesson C; Atroshi I; Ekdahl C
J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):727-34; discussion 735-7. PubMed ID: 15249101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.
Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Chan AW; Krleza-Jerić K; Schmid I; Altman DG
CMAJ; 2004 Sep; 171(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 15451835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany].
Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improvement in the quality of randomized controlled trials among general anesthesiology journals 2000 to 2006: a 6-year follow-up.
Greenfield ML; Mhyre JM; Mashour GA; Blum JM; Yen EC; Rosenberg AL
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1916-21. PubMed ID: 19448222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of reporting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in the nursing literature: application of the consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT).
Smith BA; Lee HJ; Lee JH; Choi M; Jones DE; Bausell RB; Broome ME
Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(1):31-37. PubMed ID: 18237622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Completeness of reporting of patient-relevant clinical trial outcomes: comparison of unpublished clinical study reports with publicly available data.
Wieseler B; Wolfram N; McGauran N; Kerekes MF; Vervölgyi V; Kohlepp P; Kamphuis M; Grouven U
PLoS Med; 2013 Oct; 10(10):e1001526. PubMed ID: 24115912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Registered and Reported Outcomes in Randomized Clinical Trials Published in Anesthesiology Journals.
Jones PM; Chow JTY; Arango MF; Fridfinnson JA; Gai N; Lam K; Turkstra TP
Anesth Analg; 2017 Oct; 125(4):1292-1300. PubMed ID: 28704247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of randomized controlled trial registry entries and content of reports in surgery journals.
Rosenthal R; Dwan K
Ann Surg; 2013 Jun; 257(6):1007-15. PubMed ID: 23478520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journals.
Thakur A; Wang EC; Chiu TT; Chen W; Ko CY; Chang JT; Atkinson JB; Fonkalsrud EW; Grosfeld JL
J Pediatr Surg; 2001 Aug; 36(8):1160-4. PubMed ID: 11479847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety by modifying the CONSORT statement.
O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; ; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R
Zoonoses Public Health; 2010 Mar; 57(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20070653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The REFLECT statement: methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized controlled trials for livestock and food safety.
O'Connor AM; Sargeant JM; Gardner IA; Dickson JS; Torrence ME; Dewey CE; Dohoo IR; Evans RB; Gray JT; Greiner M; Keefe G; Lefebvre SL; Morley PS; Ramirez A; Sischo W; Smith DR; Snedeker K; Sofos J; Ward MP; Wills R
Prev Vet Med; 2010 Jan; 93(1):11-8. PubMed ID: 19926151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
