These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
343 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22214989)
1. Comparative study of the polyvinyl siloxane technique with resin-splinted transfer copings used for multiple implant abutment impressions. Ferreira VF; Barboza EP; Gouvêa CV; Bianchini GM; Mussallem F; Carvalho WR Implant Dent; 2012 Feb; 21(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 22214989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the accuracy of plastic and metal stock trays for implant impressions. Del'acqua MA; de Avila ÉD; Amaral ÂL; Pinelli LA; de Assis Mollo F Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):544-50. PubMed ID: 22616047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. Vigolo P; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 12616240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy of Three Different Impression Materials Using Three Different Techniques for Implant Impressions: An Khan SA; Singh S; Neyaz N; Jaiswal MM; Tanwar AS; Singh A J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Feb; 22(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 34257178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Del'Acqua MA; Arioli-Filho JN; Compagnoni MA; Mollo Fde A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(2):226-36. PubMed ID: 18548918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of accuracy of multiple dental implant impressions using various splinting materials. Hariharan R; Shankar C; Rajan M; Baig MR; Azhagarasan NS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 20209185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Choi JH; Lim YJ; Yim SH; Kim CW Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):761-8. PubMed ID: 17974110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of different impression techniques for internal-connection implants. Lee YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):823-30. PubMed ID: 19865622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of splinting in accuracy of two implant impression techniques. de Avila ED; de Matos Moraes F; Castanharo SM; Del'Acqua MA; de Assis Mollo F J Oral Implantol; 2014 Dec; 40(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 25506658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Assif D; Nissan J; Varsano I; Singer A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(6):885-8. PubMed ID: 10612928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study. Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of impression techniques for implants. Part 2 - comparison of splinting techniques. Filho HG; Mazaro JV; Vedovatto E; Assunção WG; dos Santos PH J Prosthodont; 2009 Feb; 18(2):172-6. PubMed ID: 19178624 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of implant angulation, connection length, and impression material on the dimensional accuracy of implant impressions: an in vitro comparative study. Sorrentino R; Gherlone EF; Calesini G; Zarone F Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 May; 12 Suppl 1():e63-76. PubMed ID: 19438937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant. Daoudi MF; Setchell DJ; Searson LJ Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2004 Mar; 12(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 15058176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study. Papaspyridakos P; Lal K; White GS; Weber HP; Gallucci GO Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1267-72. PubMed ID: 22167432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Naconecy MM; Teixeira ER; Shinkai RS; Frasca LC; Cervieri A Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 15101589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses. Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of implant impressions with coded healing abutments and different implant angulations. Al-Abdullah K; Zandparsa R; Finkelman M; Hirayama H J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Aug; 110(2):90-100. PubMed ID: 23929370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of impressions with different impression materials in angulated implants. Reddy S; Prasad K; Vakil H; Jain A; Chowdhary R Niger J Clin Pract; 2013; 16(3):279-84. PubMed ID: 23771446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]