253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22215451)
41. Phantom Stimulation for Cochlear Implant Users With Residual Low-Frequency Hearing.
Krüger B; Büchner A; Nogueira W
Ear Hear; 2022; 43(2):631-645. PubMed ID: 34593687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing.
Neben N; Buechner A; Schuessler M; Lenarz T
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):88-99. PubMed ID: 29214896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users.
Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Sep; 8(3):384-92. PubMed ID: 17587137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users.
Jones GL; Won JH; Drennan WR; Rubinstein JT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jan; 133(1):425-33. PubMed ID: 23297914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Training of cochlear implant users to improve pitch perception in the presence of competing place cues.
Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(2):e1-e13. PubMed ID: 25329372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evidence of across-channel processing for spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant listeners.
Won JH; Jones GL; Drennan WR; Jameyson EM; Rubinstein JT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2088-97. PubMed ID: 21973363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Fitting prelingually deafened adult cochlear implant users based on electrode discrimination performance.
Debruyne JA; Francart T; Janssen AM; Douma K; Brokx JP
Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):174-185. PubMed ID: 27758152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Fundamental-frequency discrimination based on temporal-envelope cues: Effects of bandwidth and interference.
Mehta AH; Oxenham AJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL423. PubMed ID: 30522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of age and hearing mechanism on spectral resolution in normal hearing and cochlear-implanted listeners.
Horn DL; Dudley DJ; Dedhia K; Nie K; Drennan WR; Won JH; Rubinstein JT; Werner LA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Jan; 141(1):613. PubMed ID: 28147578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With Standard Length Electrodes in Adult Cochlear Implantation and the Uptake of Electroacoustic Stimulation.
Harrison L; Manjaly JG; Ellis W; Lavy JA; Shaida A; Khalil SS; Saeed SR
Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):1060-1065. PubMed ID: 32569131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users.
Heng J; Cantarero G; Elhilali M; Limb CJ
Hear Res; 2011 Oct; 280(1-2):192-200. PubMed ID: 21664263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Long-Term Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Auditory Spectral Discrimination and Temporal Envelope Sensitivity and Speech Perception in Noise.
An YH; Sub Lee E; Hyun Kim D; Sik Oh H; Ho Won J; Joon Shim H
J Int Adv Otol; 2022 Jan; 18(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 35193845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review.
McDermott HJ
Trends Amplif; 2004; 8(2):49-82. PubMed ID: 15497033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Assessing the role of spectral and intensity cues in spectral ripple detection and discrimination in cochlear-implant users.
Anderson ES; Oxenham AJ; Nelson PB; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3925-34. PubMed ID: 23231122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Relationship between behavioral and physiological spectral-ripple discrimination.
Won JH; Clinard CG; Kwon S; Dasika VK; Nie K; Drennan WR; Tremblay KL; Rubinstein JT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2011 Jun; 12(3):375-93. PubMed ID: 21271274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Risk factors for loss of ipsilateral residual hearing after hybrid cochlear implantation.
Kopelovich JC; Reiss LA; Oleson JJ; Lundt ES; Gantz BJ; Hansen MR
Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep; 35(8):1403-8. PubMed ID: 24979394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Discrimination of Schroeder-phase harmonic complexes by normal-hearing and cochlear-implant listeners.
Drennan WR; Longnion JK; Ruffin C; Rubinstein JT
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2008 Mar; 9(1):138-49. PubMed ID: 18066624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
