These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22215466)
21. Cross-situational word learning in aphasia. Peñaloza C; Mirman D; Cardona P; Juncadella M; Martin N; Laine M; Rodríguez-Fornells A Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():12-27. PubMed ID: 28570928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Sampling to learn words: Adults and children sample words that reduce referential ambiguity. Zettersten M; Saffran JR Dev Sci; 2021 May; 24(3):e13064. PubMed ID: 33206454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Improvements of Statistical Learning Skills Allow Older Children to Go Beyond Single-Hypothesis Testing When Learning Words. Sia MY; Mayor J J Child Lang; 2021 Sep; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 34519266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Infants' learning of novel words in a stochastic environment. Vouloumanos A; Werker JF Dev Psychol; 2009 Nov; 45(6):1611-7. PubMed ID: 19899918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Learning vocabulary and grammar from cross-situational statistics. Rebuschat P; Monaghan P; Schoetensack C Cognition; 2021 Jan; 206():104475. PubMed ID: 33220942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cross-situational word learning is both implicit and strategic. Kachergis G; Yu C; Shiffrin RM Front Psychol; 2014; 5():588. PubMed ID: 24982644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Sometimes it is better to know less: How known words influence referent selection and retention in 18- to 24-month-old children. Kucker SC; McMurray B; Samuelson LK J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Jan; 189():104705. PubMed ID: 31634736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Visual attention is not enough: Individual differences in statistical word-referent learning in infants. Smith LB; Yu C Lang Learn Dev; 2013 Jan; 9(1):. PubMed ID: 24403867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Combining statistics: the role of phonotactics on cross-situational word learning. Dal Ben R; Souza DH; Hay JF Psicol Reflex Crit; 2022 Sep; 35(1):30. PubMed ID: 36169750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Infants Encode Phonetic Detail during Cross-Situational Word Learning. Escudero P; Mulak KE; Vlach HA Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1419. PubMed ID: 27708605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Statistical Word Learning is a Continuous Process: Evidence from the Human Simulation Paradigm. Zhang Y; Yurovsky D; Yu C Cogsci; 2015 Jul; 2015():2793-2798. PubMed ID: 29226281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Reduced Implicit but not Explicit Knowledge of Cross-Situational Statistical Learning in Developmental Dyslexia. Kligler N; Yu C; Gabay Y Cogn Sci; 2023 Sep; 47(9):e13325. PubMed ID: 37656831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel word acquisition in aphasia: Facing the word-referent ambiguity of natural language learning contexts. Peñaloza C; Mirman D; Tuomiranta L; Benetello A; Heikius IM; Järvinen S; Majos MC; Cardona P; Juncadella M; Laine M; Martin N; Rodríguez-Fornells A Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():14-31. PubMed ID: 27085892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The unrealized promise of infant statistical word-referent learning. Smith LB; Suanda SH; Yu C Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 May; 18(5):251-8. PubMed ID: 24637154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Caregivers use gesture contingently to support word learning. Cheung RW; Hartley C; Monaghan P Dev Sci; 2021 Jul; 24(4):e13098. PubMed ID: 33550693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The company objects keep: Linking referents together during cross-situational word learning. Zettersten M; Wojcik E; Benitez VL; Saffran J J Mem Lang; 2018 Apr; 99():62-73. PubMed ID: 29503502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Frank MC; Goodman ND; Tenenbaum JB Psychol Sci; 2009 May; 20(5):578-85. PubMed ID: 19389131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cross-situational Learning From Ambiguous Egocentric Input Is a Continuous Process: Evidence Using the Human Simulation Paradigm. Zhang Y; Yurovsky D; Yu C Cogn Sci; 2021 Jul; 45(7):e13010. PubMed ID: 34213788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]