110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22215696)
1. Systematic selection of screening participants by risk score in a Chlamydia screening programme is feasible and effective.
van den Broek IV; Brouwers EE; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Op de Coul EL; Fennema JS; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; Hoebe CJ
Sex Transm Infect; 2012 Apr; 88(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 22215696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Who participates in the Dutch Chlamydia screening? A study on demographic and behavioral correlates of participation and positivity.
Op de Coul EL; Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; van den Broek IV
Sex Transm Dis; 2012 Feb; 39(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 22249297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prevalence of urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis increases significantly with level of urbanisation and suggests targeted screening approaches: results from the first national population based study in the Netherlands.
van Bergen J; Götz HM; Richardus JH; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ;
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 15681716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptability of the internet-based Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands and insights into nonresponse.
Greenland KE; Op de Coul EL; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema HJ; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van den Broek IV
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jun; 38(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 21217416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rationale, design, and results of the first screening round of a comprehensive, register-based, Chlamydia screening implementation programme in the Netherlands.
van Bergen JE; Fennema JS; van den Broek IV; Brouwers EE; de Feijter EM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; de Coul EL; van Ravesteijn SM; Götz HM
BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Oct; 10():293. PubMed ID: 20925966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementation.
van den Broek IV; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Hoebe CJ; Koekenbier RH; Kretzschmar M; Over EA; Schmid BV; Pars LL; van Ravesteijn SM; van der Sande MA; de Wit GA; Low N; Op de Coul EL
BMJ; 2012 Jul; 345():e4316. PubMed ID: 22767614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prediction rule for selective screening of Chlamydia trachomatis infection.
Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Broer J; Hoebe CJ; Steyerberg EW; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
Sex Transm Infect; 2005 Feb; 81(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 15681717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Opportunistic screening for genital infections with Chlamydia trachomatis among the sexually active population of Amsterdam. Il Over 90% participation and almost 5% prevalence].
van den Hoek JA; Mulder-Folkerts DK; Coutinho RA; Dukers NH; Buimer M; van Doornum GJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):668-72. PubMed ID: 10321299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Systematic home screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infections of asymptomatic men and women in family practice by means of mail-in urine samples].
van Valkengoed IG; Boeke AJ; van den Brule AJ; Morré SA; Dekker JH; Meijer CJ; van Eijk JT
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):672-6. PubMed ID: 10321300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation design of a systematic, selective, internet-based, Chlamydia screening implementation in the Netherlands, 2008-2010: implications of first results for the analysis.
van den Broek IV; Hoebe CJ; van Bergen JE; Brouwers EE; de Feijter EM; Fennema JS; Götz HM; Koekenbier RH; van Ravesteijn SM; de Coul EL
BMC Infect Dis; 2010 Apr; 10():89. PubMed ID: 20374635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The C-project: use of self-collection kits to screen for Chlamydia trachomatis in young people in a community-based health promotion project.
Martin L; Freedman E; Burton L; Rutter S; Knight V; D'Amato A; Murray C; Drysdale J; Harvey S; McNulty A
Sex Health; 2009 Jun; 6(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 19457296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening male prisoners for Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on test positivity among women from their neighborhoods who were tested in family planning clinics.
Peterman TA; Newman DR; Goldberg M; Anschuetz GL; Salmon M; Satterwhite CL; Berman SM
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Jul; 36(7):425-9. PubMed ID: 19525892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High yield of reinfections by home-based automatic rescreening of Chlamydia positives in a large-scale register-based screening programme and determinants of repeat infections.
Götz HM; van den Broek IV; Hoebe CJ; Brouwers EE; Pars LL; Fennema JS; Koekenbier RH; van Ravesteijn S; Op de Coul EL; van Bergen J
Sex Transm Infect; 2013 Feb; 89(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 22728910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lessons learned from a population-based chlamydia screening pilot.
Götz HM; van Bergen JE; Veldhuijzen IK; Hoebe CJ; Broer J; Coenen AJ; de Groot F; Verhooren MJ; van Schaik DT; Richardus JH
Int J STD AIDS; 2006 Dec; 17(12):826-30. PubMed ID: 17212860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved].
Dekker JH
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Self-screening for Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis in the human immunodeficiency virus clinic--high yields and high acceptability.
Soni S; White JA
Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1107-9. PubMed ID: 22082720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis infection: which group should be targeted and at what price?].
van Vloten WA
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1999 Mar; 143(13):652-3. PubMed ID: 10321294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.
Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M
Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk assessment and other screening options for gonorrhoea and chlamydial infections in women attending rural Tanzanian antenatal clinics.
Mayaud P; Grosskurth H; Changalucha J; Todd J; West B; Gabone R; Senkoro K; Rusizoka M; Laga M; Hayes R
Bull World Health Organ; 1995; 73(5):621-30. PubMed ID: 8846488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk scores to detect cervical infections in urban antenatal clinic attenders in Mwanza, Tanzania.
Mayaud P; Uledi E; Cornelissen J; ka-Gina G; Todd J; Rwakatare M; West B; Kopwe L; Manoko D; Grosskurth H; Hayes R; Mabey D
Sex Transm Infect; 1998 Jun; 74 Suppl 1():S139-46. PubMed ID: 10023365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
