These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

210 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22215933)

  • 21. Computerised speech and language therapy or attention control added to usual care for people with long-term post-stroke aphasia: the Big CACTUS three-arm RCT.
    Palmer R; Dimairo M; Latimer N; Cross E; Brady M; Enderby P; Bowen A; Julious S; Harrison M; Alshreef A; Bradley E; Bhadhuri A; Chater T; Hughes H; Witts H; Herbert E; Cooper C
    Health Technol Assess; 2020 Apr; 24(19):1-176. PubMed ID: 32369007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of visual information on the intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Keintz CK; Bunton K; Hoit JD
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2007 Aug; 16(3):222-34. PubMed ID: 17666548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Intelligibility of oesophageal and tracheo-oesophageal speech: preliminary observations.
    Max L; De Bruyn W; Steurs W
    Eur J Disord Commun; 1997; 32(4):429-40. PubMed ID: 9519117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Communication efficiency of dysarthric speakers as measured by sentence intelligibility and speaking rate.
    Yorkston KM; Beukelman DR
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1981 Aug; 46(3):296-301. PubMed ID: 7278175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Recognition of spoken words by native and non-native listeners: talker-, listener-, and item-related factors.
    Bradlow AR; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Oct; 106(4 Pt 1):2074-85. PubMed ID: 10530030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The homogeneity with respect to intelligibility of recorded word-recognition materials.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Apr; 26(4):331-45. PubMed ID: 25879238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reliability and validity of a computer-mediated, single-word intelligibility test: preliminary findings for children with repaired cleft lip and palate.
    Zajac DJ; Plante C; Lloyd A; Haley KL
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2011 Sep; 48(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 20828293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing speech intelligibility of pathological speech: test types, ratings and transcription measures.
    Xue W; van Hout R; Cucchiarini C; Strik H
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2023 Jan; 37(1):52-76. PubMed ID: 34955083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Smart speaker devices can improve speech intelligibility in adults with intellectual disability.
    Smith E; Sumner P; Hedge C; Powell G
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):583-593. PubMed ID: 33772998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of techniques for measuring intelligibility of dysarthric speech.
    Yorkston KM; Beukelman DR
    J Commun Disord; 1978 Dec; 11(6):499-512. PubMed ID: 739065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of the speaker and other factors affecting speech intelligibility.
    Hood JD; Poole JP
    Audiology; 1980; 19(5):434-55. PubMed ID: 7436861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparing language samples of Bangla speakers using a colour photograph and a black-and-white line drawing.
    Mazumdar B; Donovan NJ; Sultana A
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2020 Sep; 55(5):793-805. PubMed ID: 32767712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Single-word intelligibility in speakers with repaired cleft palate.
    Whitehill TL; Chau CH
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2004; 18(4-5):341-55. PubMed ID: 15259575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessing the treatment effects in apraxia of speech: introduction and evaluation of the Modified Diadochokinesis Test.
    Hurkmans J; Jonkers R; Boonstra AM; Stewart RE; Reinders-Messelink HA
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2012; 47(4):427-36. PubMed ID: 22788228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. An exploration of listener variability in intelligibility judgments.
    McHenry M
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 May; 20(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 21317298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Listener Perceptions of Simulated Fluent Speech in Nonfluent Aphasia Aphasiology.
    Harmon TG; Jacks A; Haley KL; Faldowski RA
    Aphasiology; 2016; 30(8):922-942. PubMed ID: 34650319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of Startling Acoustic Stimuli on Word Repetition in Individuals With Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Following Stroke.
    Swann Z; Daliri A; Honeycutt CF
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 May; 65(5):1671-1685. PubMed ID: 35377739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intelligibility of emotional speech in younger and older adults.
    Dupuis K; Pichora-Fuller MK
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):695-707. PubMed ID: 25127327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Relationship Between Single-Word Speech Severity and Intelligibility in Childhood Apraxia of Speech.
    Chenausky KV; Gagné D; Stipancic KL; Shield A; Green JR
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Mar; 65(3):843-857. PubMed ID: 35133873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relationship Between F2 Slope and Intelligibility in Parkinson's Disease: Lexical Effects and Listening Environment.
    Chiu YF; Forrest K; Loux T
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2019 Jul; 28(2S):887-894. PubMed ID: 31306601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.