These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22217007)

  • 41. Controlled RNA contamination and degradation and its impact on qPCR gene expression in S. epidermidis biofilms.
    Carvalhais V; Delgado-Rastrollo M; Melo LD; Cerca N
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Nov; 95(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 23999274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Assessing and reducing sources of gene expression variability in Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms.
    Sousa C; França A; Cerca N
    Biotechniques; 2014 Dec; 57(6):295-301. PubMed ID: 25495729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Flexible microfluidic device for mechanical property characterization of soft viscoelastic solids such as bacterial biofilms.
    Hohne DN; Younger JG; Solomon MJ
    Langmuir; 2009 Jul; 25(13):7743-51. PubMed ID: 19219968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Determination of mechanical properties of biofilms by modelling the deformation measured using optical coherence tomography.
    Picioreanu C; Blauert F; Horn H; Wagner M
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 145():588-598. PubMed ID: 30199803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A multi-scale model for the analysis of the inhomogeneity of elastic properties of DNA biofilm on microcantilevers.
    Zhang NH; Meng WL; Tan ZQ
    Biomaterials; 2013 Feb; 34(7):1833-42. PubMed ID: 23228426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46.
    Pavlovsky L; Younger JG; Solomon MJ
    Soft Matter; 2013 Jan; 9(1):122-131. PubMed ID: 25544855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Biofilm Cohesive Strength as a Basis for Biofilm Recalcitrance: Are Bacterial Biofilms Overdesigned?
    Aggarwal S; Stewart PS; Hozalski RM
    Microbiol Insights; 2015; 8(Suppl 2):29-32. PubMed ID: 26819559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Biofilm viscoelasticity and nutrient source location control biofilm growth rate, migration rate, and morphology in shear flow.
    Nguyen H; Ybarra A; Başağaoğlu H; Shindell O
    Sci Rep; 2021 Aug; 11(1):16118. PubMed ID: 34373534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Failure characteristics of multiple-component fibrin-based adhesives.
    Sierra DH; Eberhardt AW; Lemons JE
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002 Jan; 59(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 11745531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Experimental Investigation and Constitutive Modeling of the Uncured Rubber Compound Based on the DMA Strain Scanning Method.
    Li Y; Sun X; Zhang S; Miao Y; Han S
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33207716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Towards standardized mechanical characterization of microbial biofilms: analysis and critical review.
    Boudarel H; Mathias JD; Blaysat B; Grédiac M
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2018; 4():17. PubMed ID: 30131867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Recent advances in mechanical characterisation of biofilm and their significance for material modelling.
    Böl M; Ehret AE; Bolea Albero A; Hellriegel J; Krull R
    Crit Rev Biotechnol; 2013 Jun; 33(2):145-71. PubMed ID: 22642670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Critical length scales and strain localization govern the mechanical performance of multi-layer graphene assemblies.
    Xia W; Ruiz L; Pugno NM; Keten S
    Nanoscale; 2016 Mar; 8(12):6456-62. PubMed ID: 26935048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Arrested fungal biofilms as low-modulus structural bio-composites: Water holds the key.
    Aravinda Narayanan R; Ahmed A
    Eur Phys J E Soft Matter; 2019 Oct; 42(10):134. PubMed ID: 31643003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. High-throughput assays show the timescale for phagocytic success depends on the target toughness.
    Bakhtiari LA; Wells MJ; Gordon VD
    Biophys Rev (Melville); 2021 Sep; 2(3):031402. PubMed ID: 34632456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A method of measuring dynamic strain under electromagnetic forming conditions.
    Chen J; Xi X; Wang S; Lu J; Guo C; Wang W; Liu E; Wang W; Liu L; Wu G
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2016 Apr; 87(4):043902. PubMed ID: 27131683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Yielding behaviour of chemically treated
    Charlton SGV; Jana S; Chen J
    Biofilm; 2024 Dec; 8():100209. PubMed ID: 39071175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of phosphate and silicate on stiffness and viscoelasticity of mature biofilms developed with simulated drinking water.
    Huang C; Clark GG; Zaki FR; Won J; Ning R; Boppart SA; Elbanna AE; Nguyen TH
    Biofouling; 2023 Jan; 39(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 36847486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Nonlinear rheological characteristics of single species bacterial biofilms.
    Jana S; Charlton SGV; Eland LE; Burgess JG; Wipat A; Curtis TP; Chen J
    NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes; 2020 Apr; 6(1):19. PubMed ID: 32286319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Regulating, Measuring, and Modeling the Viscoelasticity of Bacterial Biofilms.
    Charlton SGV; White MA; Jana S; Eland LE; Jayathilake PG; Burgess JG; Chen J; Wipat A; Curtis TP
    J Bacteriol; 2019 Sep; 201(18):. PubMed ID: 31182499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.