These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22217132)
21. 2008-2009 National Health Law Moot Court Competition: problem. Pope T J Leg Med; 2009; 30(4):443-66. PubMed ID: 19953402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Increasing consent for organ donation: mandated choice, individual autonomy, and informed consent. Cotter H Health Matrix Clevel; 2011; 21(2):599-626. PubMed ID: 22145526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Are the 21-year-old Baby Doe rules misunderstood or mistaken? Kopelman LM Pediatrics; 2005 Mar; 115(3):797-802. PubMed ID: 15741390 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Constitutional law--privacy rights--consent requirements and abortions for minors. Crawford LD NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1981; 26(3):837-54. PubMed ID: 11658323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Consent and organ donation. Cooper SM Rutgers Comput Technol Law J; 1985; 11(2):559-88. PubMed ID: 12091919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Doesn't a man have any say? Fathers go to court to stop abortions. Jacoby T Newsweek; 1988 May; 61(21):74-5. PubMed ID: 11650788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The regulation of organ procurement and transplantation in the United States. Cotton RD; Sandler AL Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1986 Nov; 8(9):7-36. PubMed ID: 10279554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The principles of gift law and the regulation of organ donation. Glazier AK Transpl Int; 2011 Apr; 24(4):368-72. PubMed ID: 21276090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Medical ethics and the civil rights movement. Why informed consent is too little, too late. Sellers J Second Opin; 1989 Nov; (12):46-61. PubMed ID: 10304148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Presumed consent to organ donation: a reevaluation. Mehlman MJ Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):31-66. PubMed ID: 10121878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Abortion 1990s: contemporary issues and the activist court. Bertz RC West State Univ Law Rev; 1992; 19(2):393-429. PubMed ID: 16047452 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Informed consent for research is related to basic legal rights of all individuals. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2000 Mar; 15(3):7-8. PubMed ID: 12199224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Are we morally obligated to make gifts of our bodies? Murray TH Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 10121877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimentation on humans and gifts of tissue: Articles 20-23 of the Civil Code. Owker WF McGill Law J; 1973; 19(2):161-94. PubMed ID: 11664267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Developments in the law. Medical technology and the law. Harv Law Rev; 1990 May; 103(7):1519-676. PubMed ID: 10106697 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Constitutional law: substantive due process and the incompetent organ donor. Morris JR Oklahoma Law Rev; 1980; 33(1):126-39. PubMed ID: 11663091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Familial consent for registered organ donors: a legally rejected concept. Cook K Health Matrix Clevel; 2007; 17(1):117-45. PubMed ID: 17849818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. First person consent: OPOs across the country are adapting to the change. Sokohl K UNOS Update; 2002; ():1, 3. PubMed ID: 15460622 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Do we own our bodies? Calabresi G Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 10121879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]