BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22218408)

  • 21. Vena cava 3D contrast-enhanced MR venography: a pictorial review.
    Lin J; Zhou KR; Chen ZW; Wang JH; Yan ZP; Wang YX
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2005; 28(6):795-805. PubMed ID: 16059759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
    Lin J; Li D; Yan F
    Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Low-dose, time-resolved, contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography in the assessment of the abdominal aorta and its major branches at 3 Tesla.
    Kramer U; Fenchel M; Laub G; Seeger A; Klumpp B; Bretschneider C; Finn JP; Claussen CD; Miller S
    Acad Radiol; 2010 May; 17(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20171907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of the uterine artery before uterine arterial embolization: comparison of unenhanced 3D water-excitation sensitivity-encoding time-of-flight (WEST) and gadolinium-enhanced 3D sensitivity-encoding water-excitation multishot echo-planar (SWEEP) MR angiography.
    Mori K; Shiigai M; Ueda T; Kita N; Tanaka N; Minami M
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Mar; 27(3):557-62. PubMed ID: 18307198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intraarterial gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the renal arteries in humans: feasibility, contrast agent reduction, and accuracy for detection of stenoses.
    Zorger N; Jung EM; Hamer OW; Paetzel C; Schreyer A; Seitz J; Stehr A; Steinbauer M; Feuerbach S; Herold T
    Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2008; 38(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 18198411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR venographic evaluation of patency of central veins in the thorax: initial experience.
    Shinde TS; Lee VS; Rofsky NM; Krinsky GA; Weinreb JC
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):555-60. PubMed ID: 10551241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the aortic arch vessels in the detection of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular occlusive disease.
    Krinsky G; Maya M; Rofsky N; Lebowitz J; Nelson PK; Ambrosino M; Kaminer E; Earls J; Masters L; Giangola G; Litt A; Weinreb J
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1998; 22(2):167-78. PubMed ID: 9530375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Magnetic resonance venography of the upper venous system with blood pool contrast agent: comparison of two different T1-weighted sequences.
    Boettcher J; Pfeil A; Wolf G; Hansch A
    Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(2):245-50. PubMed ID: 23465975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abdominopelvic and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: evaluation with contrast-enhanced MR venography with a blood-pool agent.
    Huang SY; Kim CY; Miller MJ; Gupta RT; Lessne ML; Horvath JJ; Boll DT; Evans PD; Befera NT; Krishnan P; Chan JL; Merkle EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Jul; 201(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 23789677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cerebral MR venography in children: comparison of 2D time-of-flight and gadolinium-enhanced 3D gradient-echo techniques.
    Rollins N; Ison C; Reyes T; Chia J
    Radiology; 2005 Jun; 235(3):1011-7. PubMed ID: 15860678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of real-time three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced elliptic centric-ordered MR venography and two-dimensional time-of-flight MR venography of the intracranial venous system.
    Fu JH; Lai PH; Hsiao CC; Li SC; Weng MJ; Wang PC; Chen CK
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2010 Mar; 73(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 20230997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is true FISP imaging reliable in the evaluation of venous thrombosis?
    Pedrosa I; Morrin M; Oleaga L; Baptista J; Rofsky NM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Dec; 185(6):1632-40. PubMed ID: 16304026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance venography in suspected thrombo-occlusive disease of the central chest veins.
    Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Arnold R; Fritsche L; Hamm B
    Chest; 2001 Nov; 120(5):1570-6. PubMed ID: 11713136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abdomen, pelvis, and extremities: diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced turbo MR angiography compared with conventional angiography-initial experience.
    Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Sakaguchi T; Ogata I; Takahashi M; Hiai Y
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):909-15. PubMed ID: 10966731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative evaluation of 2D time-of-flight and 3D elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR venography in patients with presumptive cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis.
    Klingebiel R; Bauknecht HC; Bohner G; Kirsch R; Berger J; Masuhr F
    Eur J Neurol; 2007 Feb; 14(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 17250720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High resolution, 3-dimensional Ferumoxytol-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance venography in central venous occlusion.
    Shahrouki P; Moriarty JM; Khan SN; Bista B; Kee ST; DeRubertis BG; Yoshida T; Nguyen KL; Finn JP
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2019 Mar; 21(1):17. PubMed ID: 30853026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Evaluation of sinus meningiomas in the region of interest by high-resolution three dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance venography].
    Chen J; Han X; Shi K; Guan Y; Zhan Y; Li X; Li X; Nie L
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2012 Feb; 37(2):203-7. PubMed ID: 22561442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cerebral venography using fluid-suppressed STARFIRE.
    Edelman RR; Koktzoglou I; Ankenbrandt WJ; Dunkle EE
    Magn Reson Med; 2009 Aug; 62(2):538-43. PubMed ID: 19365867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Non-contrast-enhanced MR venography of the upper limb: a comparative study of acquisitions with fresh blood imaging vs. time-of-flight methods.
    Harigai M; Okada T; Umeoka S; Nagayama S; Tanaka E; Fujimoto K; Kido A; Takeda K; Togashi K; Sakai Y
    Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 22920352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparative study of magnetic resonance venography techniques for the evaluation of the internal jugular veins in multiple sclerosis patients.
    Rahman MT; Sethi SK; Utriainen DT; Hewett JJ; Haacke EM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Dec; 31(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 23850076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.