These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22218460)
21. Evidence of incipient forest transition in Southern Mexico. Vaca RA; Golicher DJ; Cayuela L; Hewson J; Steininger M PLoS One; 2012; 7(8):e42309. PubMed ID: 22905123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rural aquaculture as a sustainable alternative for forest conservation in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. López-García J; Manzo-Delgado LL; Alcántara-Ayala I J Environ Manage; 2014 Jun; 138():43-54. PubMed ID: 24582304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of land use, cover, and protection on stream and riparian ecosystem services and biodiversity. Hanna DEL; Raudsepp-Hearne C; Bennett EM Conserv Biol; 2020 Feb; 34(1):244-255. PubMed ID: 31135078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. How effective are biodiversity conservation payments in Mexico? Costedoat S; Corbera E; Ezzine-de-Blas D; Honey-Rosés J; Baylis K; Castillo-Santiago MA PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0119881. PubMed ID: 25807118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessing the impact of three biosphere reserves on the conservation of coastal ecosystems. Bazant-Fabre O; Muñoz-Piña C; Luisa Martínez M; Lithgow D; Bonilla-Moheno M J Environ Manage; 2024 Aug; 366():121671. PubMed ID: 39003910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Natural resource management in a protected area of the Indian Himalayas: a modeling approach for anthropogenic interactions on ecosystem. Nautiyal S; Kaechele H Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Jun; 153(1-4):253-71. PubMed ID: 18604590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Which management measures lead to better performance of China's protected areas in reducing forest loss? Feng C; Cao M; Wang W; Wang H; Liu F; Zhang L; Du J; Zhou Y; Huang W; Li J Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 764():142895. PubMed ID: 33131857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analytical solutions to trade-offs between size of protected areas and land-use intensity. Butsic V; Radeloff VC; Kuemmerle T; Pidgeon AM Conserv Biol; 2012 Oct; 26(5):883-93. PubMed ID: 22809426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Land-use strategies to balance livestock production, biodiversity conservation and carbon storage in Yucatán, Mexico. Williams DR; Alvarado F; Green RE; Manica A; Phalan B; Balmford A Glob Chang Biol; 2017 Dec; 23(12):5260-5272. PubMed ID: 28614629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Integrating forest ecosystem services into the farming landscape: A stochastic economic assessment. Monge JJ; Parker WJ; Richardson JW J Environ Manage; 2016 Jun; 174():87-99. PubMed ID: 26868442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [State strategy for Cycad (Zamiaceae) conservation: a proposal for the State of Hidalgo, Mexico]. Vite A; Pulido MT; Flores-Vázquez JC Rev Biol Trop; 2013 Sep; 61(3):1119-31. PubMed ID: 24027912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Policies for reduced deforestation and their impact on agricultural production. Angelsen A Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2010 Nov; 107(46):19639-44. PubMed ID: 20643935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biodiversity conservation in agricultural landscapes: challenges and opportunities of coffee agroforests in the Western Ghats, India. Garcia CA; Bhagwat SA; Ghazoul J; Nath CD; Nanaya KM; Kushalappa CG; Raghuramulu Y; Nasi R; Vaast P Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):479-88. PubMed ID: 20028413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Protected areas: mixed success in conserving East Africa's evergreen forests. Pfeifer M; Burgess ND; Swetnam RD; Platts PJ; Willcock S; Marchant R PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e39337. PubMed ID: 22768074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Post-socialist forest disturbance in the Carpathian border region of Poland, Slovakia, and Ukraine. Kuemmerle T; Hostert P; Radeloff VC; Perzanowski K; Kruhlov I Ecol Appl; 2007 Jul; 17(5):1279-95. PubMed ID: 17708208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effects of governmental protected areas and social initiatives for land protection on the conservation of Mexican amphibians. Ochoa-Ochoa L; Urbina-Cardona JN; Vázquez LB; Flores-Villela O; Bezaury-Creel J PLoS One; 2009 Sep; 4(9):e6878. PubMed ID: 19721719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Emerging challenges for sustainable development and forest conservation in Sarawak, Borneo. Alamgir M; Campbell MJ; Sloan S; Engert J; Word J; Laurance WF PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229614. PubMed ID: 32126070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. National-Level Wetland Policy Specificity and Goals Vary According to Political and Economic Indicators. Peimer AW; Krzywicka AE; Cohen DB; Van den Bosch K; Buxton VL; Stevenson NA; Matthews JW Environ Manage; 2017 Jan; 59(1):141-153. PubMed ID: 27624708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Policy challenges and approaches for the conservation of mangrove forests in Southeast Asia. Friess DA; Thompson BS; Brown B; Amir AA; Cameron C; Koldewey HJ; Sasmito SD; Sidik F Conserv Biol; 2016 Oct; 30(5):933-49. PubMed ID: 27341487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]