117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22218789)
1. DSM-5 paraphilic diagnoses and SVP law.
Tucker D; Brakel SJ
Arch Sex Behav; 2012 Jun; 41(3):533. PubMed ID: 22218789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of DSM paraphilia diagnoses in sexually violent predator commitment cases.
First MB; Halon RL
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 19092060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. DSM-5 proposed diagnostic criteria for sexual paraphilias: tensions between diagnostic validity and forensic utility.
Wakefield JC
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(3):195-209. PubMed ID: 21531463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commentary: muddy diagnostic waters in the SVP courtroom.
Prentky RA; Coward AI; Gabriel AM
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):455-8. PubMed ID: 19092061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Paraphilia NOS, nonconsent: not ready for the courtroom.
Frances A; First MB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(4):555-61. PubMed ID: 22159984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Examining the scope of questionable diagnostic reliability in Sexually Violent Predator (SVP) evaluations.
Perillo AD; Spada AH; Calkins C; Jeglic EL
Int J Law Psychiatry; 2014; 37(2):190-7. PubMed ID: 24274914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Paraphilic diagnoses in DSM-5.
Krueger RB; Kaplan MS
Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2012; 49(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23585461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Commentary: inventing diagnosis for civil commitment of rapists.
Zander TK
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2008; 36(4):459-69. PubMed ID: 19092062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hebephilia: quintessence of diagnostic pretextuality.
Franklin K
Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):751-68. PubMed ID: 21110392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Forensic and diagnostic concerns arising from the proposed DSM-5 criteria for sexual paraphilic disorder.
Fedoroff JP
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(2):238-41. PubMed ID: 21653271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. DSM-5 and paraphilic disorders.
First MB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(2):191-201. PubMed ID: 24986346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mental disorder, predisposition, prediction, and ability to control: evaluating sex offenders for civil commitment.
Elwood RW
Sex Abuse; 2009 Dec; 21(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 19901235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Issues for DSM-V: unintended consequences of small changes: the case of paraphilias.
First MB; Frances A
Am J Psychiatry; 2008 Oct; 165(10):1240-1. PubMed ID: 18829878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Hebephilia and the construction of a fictitious diagnosis.
Good P; Burstein J
J Nerv Ment Dis; 2012 Jun; 200(6):492-4. PubMed ID: 22652613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. DSM-5: call for commentaries on gender dysphoria, sexual dysfunctions, and paraphilic disorders.
Zucker KJ
Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jul; 42(5):669-74. PubMed ID: 23797860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The DSM diagnostic criteria for exhibitionism, voyeurism, and frotteurism.
Långström N
Arch Sex Behav; 2010 Apr; 39(2):317-24. PubMed ID: 19924524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The management of sex offenders: perspectives for psychiatry.
Saleh FM; Grudzinskas AJ; Malin HM; Dwyer RG
Harv Rev Psychiatry; 2010; 18(6):359-68. PubMed ID: 21080774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Critical appraisals of the proposed DSM-5 paraphilia diagnoses.
Krueger RB
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(2):237. PubMed ID: 21653270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sexual disorders in the DSM-5].
Goethals K; Cosyns P
Tijdschr Psychiatr; 2014; 56(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 24643831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proposals to add new paraphilias to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, Edition 5 (DSM-5).
Franklin K
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2011; 39(1):137. PubMed ID: 21389175
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
