These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22218817)

  • 21. Comparison of methods for controlling maximum exposure rates in computerized adaptive testing.
    Barrada JR; Abad FJ; Veldkamp BP
    Psicothema; 2009 May; 21(2):313-20. PubMed ID: 19403088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Classification accuracy and consistency of computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Morgan DL
    Behav Res Methods; 2013 Mar; 45(1):132-42. PubMed ID: 22956358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Incorporating randomness in the Fisher information for improving item-exposure control in CATs.
    Barrada JR; Olea J; Ponsoda V; Abad FJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):493-513. PubMed ID: 17681109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Marginal likelihood inference for a model for item responses and response times.
    Glas CA; van der Linden WJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 Nov; 63(Pt 3):603-26. PubMed ID: 20109271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The impact of receiving the same items on consecutive computer adaptive test administrations.
    O'Neill T; Lunz ME; Thiede K
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):131-51. PubMed ID: 12029175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Asymptotic Distribution of Average Test Overlap Rate in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Choe EM; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1129-1151. PubMed ID: 31264029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A general framework and an R package for the detection of dichotomous differential item functioning.
    Magis D; Béland S; Tuerlinckx F; De Boeck P
    Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):847-62. PubMed ID: 20805607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Optimal Online Calibration Designs for Item Replenishment in Adaptive Testing.
    He Y; Chen P
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):35-55. PubMed ID: 31531789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Utilizing response times in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing under the higher-order deterministic input, noisy 'and' gate model.
    Huang HY
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):109-141. PubMed ID: 30793768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT].
    Abad FJ; Olea J; Aguado D; Ponsoda V; Barrada JR
    Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 20423641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adaptive testing for psychological assessment: how many items are enough to run an adaptive testing algorithm?
    Wagner-Menghin MM; Masters GN
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):106-17. PubMed ID: 23816590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Application of optimal designs to item calibration.
    Lu HY
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e106747. PubMed ID: 25188318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. On initial item selection in cognitive diagnostic computerized adaptive testing.
    Xu G; Wang C; Shang Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):291-315. PubMed ID: 27435032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sequential Detection of Compromised Items Using Response Times in Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Choe EM; Zhang J; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2018 Sep; 83(3):650-673. PubMed ID: 29168039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimal Item Calibration for Computerized Achievement Tests.
    Ul Hassan M; Miller F
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1101-1128. PubMed ID: 31183669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A simplified version of the maximum information per time unit method in computerized adaptive testing.
    Cheng Y; Diao Q; Behrens JT
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Apr; 49(2):502-512. PubMed ID: 26907749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluating the usefulness of computerized adaptive testing for medical in-course assessment.
    Kreiter CD; Ferguson K; Gruppen LD
    Acad Med; 1999 Oct; 74(10):1125-8. PubMed ID: 10536635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does standard deviation matter? Using "standard deviation" to quantify security of multistage testing.
    Wang C; Zheng Y; Chang HH
    Psychometrika; 2014 Jan; 79(1):154-74. PubMed ID: 24323297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Applying computerized adaptive testing to the CES-D scale: a simulation study.
    Smits N; Cuijpers P; van Straten A
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Jun; 188(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 21208660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Dynamic Stratification Method for Improving Trait Estimation in Computerized Adaptive Testing Under Item Exposure Control.
    Chen JH; Chao HY; Chen SY
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 May; 44(3):182-196. PubMed ID: 32341606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.