These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22220913)

  • 1. Comparison of particle-size distributions determined by optical scanning and by sieving in the assessment of masticatory performance.
    Eberhard L; Schindler HJ; Hellmann D; Schmitter M; Rammelsberg P; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2012 May; 39(5):338-48. PubMed ID: 22220913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Particle size distributions determined by optical scanning and by sieving in the assessment of masticatory performance of complete denture wearers.
    Eberhard L; Schneider S; Eiffler C; Kappel S; Giannakopoulos NN
    Clin Oral Investig; 2015 Mar; 19(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 25078549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of chewing efficiency: a comparison of particle size distribution determined using optical scanning and sieving of almonds.
    Mowlana F; Heath MR; Van der Bilt A; Van der Glas HW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Sep; 21(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 7996338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison between sieving and optical scanning for the determination of particle size distributions obtained by mastication in man.
    van der Bilt A; van der Glas HW; Mowlana F; Heath MR
    Arch Oral Biol; 1993 Feb; 38(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 8476345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of static and dynamic occlusal characteristics and muscle force on masticatory performance in dentate adults.
    Lujan-Climent M; Martinez-Gomis J; Palau S; Ayuso-Montero R; Salsench J; Peraire M
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2008 Jun; 116(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 18471241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distribution of particle sizes in food comminuted by human mastication.
    Olthoff LW; van der Bilt A; Bosman F; Kleizen HH
    Arch Oral Biol; 1984; 29(11):899-903. PubMed ID: 6596036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of oral sensorimotor function in masticatory ability.
    Hirano K; Hirano S; Hayakawa I
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 15025651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masticatory efficiency in children with primary dentition.
    Gavião MB; Raymundo VG; Sobrinho LC
    Pediatr Dent; 2001; 23(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 11800451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing masticatory performance and mixing ability.
    van der Bilt A; Mojet J; Tekamp FA; Abbink JH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Feb; 37(2):79-84. PubMed ID: 19968766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Chewing: a matter of selection and breakage].
    Bosman F; van der Bilt A; van der Glas HW; Olthoff LW; Slagter AP
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Jan; 100(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 11908422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparisons between a mixing ability test and masticatory performance tests using a brittle or an elastic test food.
    Sugiura T; Fueki K; Igarashi Y
    J Oral Rehabil; 2009 Mar; 36(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 18713307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between chewing rate and masticatory performance.
    Sánchez-Ayala A; Farias-Neto A; Campanha NH; Garcia RC
    Cranio; 2013 Apr; 31(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 23795401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Knife mill operating factors effect on switchgrass particle size distributions.
    Bitra VS; Womac AR; Yang YT; Igathinathane C; Miu PI; Chevanan N; Sokhansanj S
    Bioresour Technol; 2009 Nov; 100(21):5176-88. PubMed ID: 19559601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Condensing results of wet sieving analyses into a single data: a comparison of methods for particle size description.
    Fritz J; Streich WJ; Schwarm A; Clauss M
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2012 Oct; 96(5):783-97. PubMed ID: 21732992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of orthognathic surgery on masticatory performance in retrognathic patients.
    van den Braber W; van der Bilt A; van der Glas HW; Bosman F; Rosenberg A; Koole R
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 15790376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Correlation between the median particle size of chewed frankfurter sausage and almonds during masticatory performance test.
    Sumonsiri P; Thongudomporn U; Paphangkorakit J
    J Oral Rehabil; 2018 Jul; 45(7):512-517. PubMed ID: 29701907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The study of comminution behavior of food on buccal and lingual side during mastication.
    Kawashima K; Miura H; Kato H; Yoshida K; Tanaka Y
    J Med Dent Sci; 2009 Dec; 56(4):131-8. PubMed ID: 20432797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining chewing efficiency using a solid test food and considering all phases of mastication.
    Liu T; Wang X; Chen J; van der Glas HW
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jul; 91():63-77. PubMed ID: 29679887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A simplified sieve method for determining masticatory performance using hydrocolloid material.
    Ohara A; Tsukiyama Y; Ogawa T; Koyano K
    J Oral Rehabil; 2003 Sep; 30(9):927-35. PubMed ID: 12950975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance.
    Lepley CR; Throckmorton GS; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):606-13. PubMed ID: 21536203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.