164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22220955)
1. A new justification for pediatric research without the potential for clinical benefit.
Wendler D
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 22220955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On Wendler's new justification for pediatric research.
Wachbroit R
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 22220960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A more persuasive justification for pediatric research.
Litton P
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):44-6. PubMed ID: 22220962
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Justifying pediatric research not expected to benefit child subjects.
Spriggs M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):42-4. PubMed ID: 22220961
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. On justifying pediatric research without the prospect of clinical benefit.
Kopelman LM
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):32-4. PubMed ID: 22220956
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Why even inappropriate parental consent might be enough to justify minimal risk pediatric research without clinical benefit.
Hunter D
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):35-6. PubMed ID: 22220957
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Consent to pediatric research: a couple of distinctions.
Petrini C
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):37-8. PubMed ID: 22220958
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The context of clinical research and its ethical relevance: the COMPAS trial as a case study.
Camporesi S; Mameli M
Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):39-40. PubMed ID: 22220959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Body matters: rethinking the ethical acceptability of non-beneficial clinical research with children.
De Clercq E; Badarau DO; Ruhe KM; Wangmo T
Med Health Care Philos; 2015 Aug; 18(3):421-31. PubMed ID: 25433817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Children's and their parents' views on facing research risks for the benefit of others.
Wendler D; Jenkins T
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2008 Jan; 162(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 18180406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Regulating "higher risk, no direct benefit" studies in minors.
Westra AE; Wit JM; Sukhai RN; de Beaufort ID
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jun; 11(6):29-31. PubMed ID: 21678214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical research with healthy volunteers: an ethical framework.
Miller FG
J Investig Med; 2003 Feb; 51 Suppl 1():S2-5. PubMed ID: 12664947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characterizing the level of risk in pediatric research: an ethical examination of the federal regulations.
Dyson M; Parsi K
J Clin Ethics; 2010; 21(3):212-20. PubMed ID: 21089990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Empirical data and the acceptability of research risk: a commentary on the charitable participation standard.
Reynolds WW; Nelson RM
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2008 Jan; 162(1):88-90. PubMed ID: 18180419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Boldt v. Boldt: A pediatric ethics perspective.
Diekema DS
J Clin Ethics; 2009; 20(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 19845198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical considerations in conducting pediatric research.
Roth-Cline M; Gerson J; Bright P; Lee CS; Nelson RM
Handb Exp Pharmacol; 2011; 205():219-44. PubMed ID: 21882114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Relative versus absolute standards for everyday risk in adolescent HIV prevention trials: expanding the debate".
Snyder J; Miller CL; Gray G
Am J Bioeth; 2011 Jun; 11(6):W1-3. PubMed ID: 21678202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Safeguarding children--pediatric research on medical countermeasures.
Gutmann A
N Engl J Med; 2013 Mar; 368(13):1171-3. PubMed ID: 23506617
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Going beyond parents and institutional review boards in protecting children involved in nontherapeutic research.
Rubinstein E
Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 2003; 33(2):251-94. PubMed ID: 15164740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pediatric consent: case study analysis using a principles approach.
Azotam AN
Nurs Ethics; 2012 Jul; 19(4):581-5. PubMed ID: 22753459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
