BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22220965)

  • 1. Protecting patient privacy redux: response to open peer commentaries on "'you don't know me, but …': access to patient data and subject recruitment in human subjects research".
    Schonfeld T; Brown JS; Amoura NJ; Gordon B
    Am J Bioeth; 2012; 12(1):W1-2. PubMed ID: 22220965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. "You don't know me, but …": access to patient data and subject recruitment in human subjects research.
    Schonfeld T; Brown JS; Amoura NJ; Gordon B
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Nov; 11(11):31-8. PubMed ID: 22047124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Saying privacy, meaning confidentiality.
    Schwab AP; Frank L; Gligorov N
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Nov; 11(11):44-5. PubMed ID: 22047127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of cloud computing in managing the deluge of potentially private genetic data.
    Greenbaum D; Gerstein M
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Nov; 11(11):39-41. PubMed ID: 22047125
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Legitimate and ethical: distinguishing when and how regulations apply in patient-oriented research.
    Lee SJ; Tiro JA; Bishop WP; Sheppard PD; Skinner CS
    Am J Bioeth; 2011 Nov; 11(11):42-3. PubMed ID: 22047126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Deidentification and its discontents: response to the Open Peer Commentaries.
    Rothstein MA
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):W1-2. PubMed ID: 20818544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Balancing individual rights with the communal right to know: health care research and public policy.
    Galambos CM
    Health Soc Work; 2003 Nov; 28(4):251-3. PubMed ID: 14679703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Informed consent to psychotherapy: protecting the dignity and respecting the autonomy of patients.
    Fisher CB; Oransky M
    J Clin Psychol; 2008 May; 64(5):576-88. PubMed ID: 18381749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. HIPAA impacting patient medical information.
    Regan J; Smith L
    Tenn Med; 2009 May; 102(5):41-2. PubMed ID: 19456029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use and disclosure of protected health information for research under the HIPAA privacy rule: unrealized patient autonomy and burdensome government regulation.
    Tovino SA
    S D Law Rev; 2004; 49(3):447-502. PubMed ID: 16493842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timing invitations to participate in clinical research: preliminary versus informed consent.
    Iltis AS
    J Med Philos; 2005 Feb; 30(1):89-106. PubMed ID: 15814369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Research recruitment via camouflaged sampling: addressing the legal and ethical aspects of privacy concerns.
    Wandall HM; Halpern SD
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Aug; 17(8):798-800. PubMed ID: 18655014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act on participant recruitment and retention.
    Wipke-Tevis DD; Pickett MA
    West J Nurs Res; 2008 Feb; 30(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 17551087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Managing patient expectations about deidentification.
    Callier SL; Schmidt H
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):21-3. PubMed ID: 20818551
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Challenging themes in American health information privacy and the public's health: historical and modern assessments.
    Hodge JG; Gostin KG
    J Law Med Ethics; 2004; 32(4):670-9. PubMed ID: 15807355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ethics in action. What the family needs to know.
    Haddad A
    RN; 2007 Nov; 70(11):23. PubMed ID: 18232117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical challenges in a randomized controlled trial of peer education among veterans service organizations.
    Whittle J; Fletcher KE; Morzinski J; Ertl K; Patterson L; Jensen W; Schapira MM
    J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2010 Dec; 5(4):43-51. PubMed ID: 21133786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Autonomy, beneficence, and the experimental subject's consent: a response to Jay Katz.
    Pellegrino ED
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1993; 38(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 11656324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why deidentification fails research subjects and researchers.
    Gellman R
    Am J Bioeth; 2010 Sep; 10(9):28-30. PubMed ID: 20818555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Response to Open Peer Commentaries on "Placebo Effects and Informed Consent".
    Alfano M
    Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(10):W1-3. PubMed ID: 26479116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.