255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22221194)
1. Deception detection from written accounts.
Masip J; Bethencourt M; Lucas G; Sánchez-San Segundo M; Herrero C
Scand J Psychol; 2012 Apr; 53(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 22221194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments.
Hartwig M; Bond CF
Psychol Bull; 2011 Jul; 137(4):643-59. PubMed ID: 21707129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Listening, not watching: situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception.
Reinhard MA; Sporer SL; Scharmach M; Marksteiner T
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Sep; 101(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 21707196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Strategic use of evidence during police interviews: when training to detect deception works.
Hartwig M; Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Kronkvist O
Law Hum Behav; 2006 Oct; 30(5):603-19. PubMed ID: 16977348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of affective states on the process of lie detection.
Reinhard MA; Schwarz N
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Dec; 18(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 23148455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving accuracy of veracity judgment through cue training.
Santarcangelo M; Cribbie RA; Hubbard AS
Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Jun; 98(3 Pt 1):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15209321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The focal account: Indirect lie detection need not access unconscious, implicit knowledge.
Street CN; Richardson DC
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2015 Dec; 21(4):342-55. PubMed ID: 26301728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting true lies: police officers' ability to detect suspects' lies.
Mann S; Vrij A; Bull R
J Appl Psychol; 2004 Feb; 89(1):137-49. PubMed ID: 14769126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Age-related differences in deception.
Ruffman T; Murray J; Halberstadt J; Vater T
Psychol Aging; 2012 Sep; 27(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 21463058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Guidance to detect deception with the Aberdeen Report Judgment Scales: are verbal content cues useful to detect false accusations?
Sporer SL; Masip J; Cramer M
Am J Psychol; 2014; 127(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 24720096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The fundamental attribution error in detecting deception: the boy-who-cried-wolf effect.
O'Sullivan M
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Oct; 29(10):1316-27. PubMed ID: 15189591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cues to deception and ability to detect lies as a function of police interview styles.
Vrij A; Mann S; Kristen S; Fisher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Oct; 31(5):499-518. PubMed ID: 17211691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are computers effective lie detectors? A meta-analysis of linguistic cues to deception.
Hauch V; Blandón-Gitlin I; Masip J; Sporer SL
Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2015 Nov; 19(4):307-42. PubMed ID: 25387767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reading Lies: Nonverbal Communication and Deception.
Vrij A; Hartwig M; Granhag PA
Annu Rev Psychol; 2019 Jan; 70():295-317. PubMed ID: 30609913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The inhibitory spillover effect: Controlling the bladder makes better liars.
Fenn E; Blandón-Gitlin I; Coons J; Pineda C; Echon R
Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():112-22. PubMed ID: 26366466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Detecting children's lies: comparing true accounts about highly stressful injuries with unprepared, prepared, and coached lies.
Warren KL; Dodd E; Raynor G; Peterson C
Behav Sci Law; 2012; 30(3):329-41. PubMed ID: 22566366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An object cue is more effective than a word in ERP-based detection of deception.
Cutmore TR; Djakovic T; Kebbell MR; Shum DH
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Mar; 71(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 18789361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Facial appearance and judgments of credibility: the effects of facial babyishness and age on statement credibility.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr; 2003 Aug; 129(3):269-311. PubMed ID: 15134128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: questioning the truth bias.
Masip J; Garrido E; Herrero C
Psychol Rep; 2009 Aug; 105(1):11-36. PubMed ID: 19810430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Deception detection: interrogators' and observers' decoding of consecutive statements.
Granhag PA; Strömwall LA
J Psychol; 2001 Nov; 135(6):603-20. PubMed ID: 11931002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
