These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22222743)

  • 1. Shaping policy: Science and politics need more empathy.
    Fisher L
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7379):29. PubMed ID: 22222743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Policy-making: Scientists cannot compete as lobbyists.
    Favaro B
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7384):162. PubMed ID: 22318591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. If you want to win the game, you must join in.
    Kassen R
    Nature; 2011 Dec; 480(7376):153. PubMed ID: 22158205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Encourage governments to heed scientific advice.
    Colglazier B
    Nature; 2016 Sep; 537(7622):587. PubMed ID: 27680902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trump vs Clinton: worlds apart on science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2016 Jul; 535(7613):473-4. PubMed ID: 27466102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US science policy: mission impossible?
    Brumfiel G
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):250-1. PubMed ID: 15029165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Califano and abortion: questions of conscience.
    Califano JA
    Washington Post; 1981 May; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647322
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Should AIDS research be regulated? A Manhattan Project for AIDS and other policy proposals.
    Salbu SR
    Indiana Law J; 1994; 69(2):425-75. PubMed ID: 11652751
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The test for Abenomics.
    Nature; 2013 Aug; 500(7460):5. PubMed ID: 23908995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. US election: Politicians should think like scientists.
    Holt R
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):493-4. PubMed ID: 23018947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The scientists who support Donald Trump.
    Reardon S
    Nature; 2016 Oct; 538(7625):298-299. PubMed ID: 27762392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Unintended consequences.
    Nature; 2016 Mar; 531(7592):7. PubMed ID: 26935659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. US election: Know your representatives.
    Goldstein L
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7417):494-5. PubMed ID: 23018948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The infighting over abortion: an administration divided.
    Califano JA
    Washington Post; 1981 May; ():A1, A6. PubMed ID: 11647323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concern is more than just 'ruffled feathers'.
    Chan KM; Porder S; Higgins PA; Kramer SB
    Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6980):255. PubMed ID: 15029167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing a federal policy on research misconduct.
    Francis S
    Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):261-72. PubMed ID: 11657864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wanted: academics wise to the needs of government.
    Tyler C
    Nature; 2017 Dec; 552(7683):7. PubMed ID: 29219985
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science.
    LaFollette MC
    J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Communicating science to policymakers: six strategies for success.
    Safford H; Brown A
    Nature; 2019 Aug; 572(7771):681-682. PubMed ID: 31439901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Genome backlash going full force.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):804. PubMed ID: 11642769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.