BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22223194)

  • 1. A discriminative Ramachandran potential of mean force aimed at minimizing secondary structure bias.
    Koppole S; Schaefer M
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Mar; 33(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 22223194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
    Grishaev A; Bax A
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
    Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
    Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental conformational energy maps of proteins and peptides.
    Balaji GA; Nagendra HG; Balaji VN; Rao SN
    Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):979-1001. PubMed ID: 28168743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical phi-psi matrices: comparison with experimental scales.
    Muñoz V; Serrano L
    Proteins; 1994 Dec; 20(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 7731949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
    Hsieh MJ; Luo R
    Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solution structure of a sweet protein single-chain monellin determined by nuclear magnetic resonance and dynamical simulated annealing calculations.
    Lee SY; Lee JH; Chang HJ; Cho JM; Jung JW; Lee W
    Biochemistry; 1999 Feb; 38(8):2340-6. PubMed ID: 10029527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of side chain conformations on local conformational features of amino acids and implication for force field development.
    Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD
    J Phys Chem B; 2010 May; 114(17):5840-50. PubMed ID: 20392111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quaternion maps of global protein structure.
    Hanson AJ; Thakur S
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():256-78. PubMed ID: 23099777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian estimation of NMR restraint potential and weight: a validation on a representative set of protein structures.
    Bernard A; Vranken WF; Bardiaux B; Nilges M; Malliavin TE
    Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1525-37. PubMed ID: 21365680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Statistical torsion angle potential energy functions for protein structure modeling: a bicubic interpolation approach.
    Kim TR; Yang JS; Shin S; Lee J
    Proteins; 2013 Jul; 81(7):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23408564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions.
    Forrest LR; Woolf TB
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 12910450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Search for allosteric disulfide bonds in NMR structures.
    Schmidt B; Hogg PJ
    BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Jul; 7():49. PubMed ID: 17640393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
    Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
    Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
    Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
    Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the quality of NMR structures by local density of protons.
    Ban YE; Rudolph J; Zhou P; Edelsbrunner H
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):852-64. PubMed ID: 16342274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
    Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel high resolution Calpha--Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set.
    Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
    Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):726-41. PubMed ID: 16981202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures.
    Gunasekaran K; Ramakrishnan C; Balaram P
    J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 8950277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.