121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22223194)
1. A discriminative Ramachandran potential of mean force aimed at minimizing secondary structure bias.
Koppole S; Schaefer M
J Comput Chem; 2012 Mar; 33(7):791-9. PubMed ID: 22223194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An empirical backbone-backbone hydrogen-bonding potential in proteins and its applications to NMR structure refinement and validation.
Grishaev A; Bax A
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Jun; 126(23):7281-92. PubMed ID: 15186165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Refinement of NMR-determined protein structures with database derived mean-force potentials.
Wu D; Jernigan R; Wu Z
Proteins; 2007 Jul; 68(1):232-42. PubMed ID: 17387736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental conformational energy maps of proteins and peptides.
Balaji GA; Nagendra HG; Balaji VN; Rao SN
Proteins; 2017 Jun; 85(6):979-1001. PubMed ID: 28168743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intrinsic secondary structure propensities of the amino acids, using statistical phi-psi matrices: comparison with experimental scales.
Muñoz V; Serrano L
Proteins; 1994 Dec; 20(4):301-11. PubMed ID: 7731949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical scoring function based on AMBER force field and Poisson-Boltzmann implicit solvent for protein structure prediction.
Hsieh MJ; Luo R
Proteins; 2004 Aug; 56(3):475-86. PubMed ID: 15229881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solution structure of a sweet protein single-chain monellin determined by nuclear magnetic resonance and dynamical simulated annealing calculations.
Lee SY; Lee JH; Chang HJ; Cho JM; Jung JW; Lee W
Biochemistry; 1999 Feb; 38(8):2340-6. PubMed ID: 10029527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of side chain conformations on local conformational features of amino acids and implication for force field development.
Jiang F; Han W; Wu YD
J Phys Chem B; 2010 May; 114(17):5840-50. PubMed ID: 20392111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quaternion maps of global protein structure.
Hanson AJ; Thakur S
J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():256-78. PubMed ID: 23099777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bayesian estimation of NMR restraint potential and weight: a validation on a representative set of protein structures.
Bernard A; Vranken WF; Bardiaux B; Nilges M; Malliavin TE
Proteins; 2011 May; 79(5):1525-37. PubMed ID: 21365680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Statistical torsion angle potential energy functions for protein structure modeling: a bicubic interpolation approach.
Kim TR; Yang JS; Shin S; Lee J
Proteins; 2013 Jul; 81(7):1156-65. PubMed ID: 23408564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Discrimination of native loop conformations in membrane proteins: decoy library design and evaluation of effective energy scoring functions.
Forrest LR; Woolf TB
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):492-509. PubMed ID: 12910450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Search for allosteric disulfide bonds in NMR structures.
Schmidt B; Hogg PJ
BMC Struct Biol; 2007 Jul; 7():49. PubMed ID: 17640393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A large data set comparison of protein structures determined by crystallography and NMR: statistical test for structural differences and the effect of crystal packing.
Andrec M; Snyder DA; Zhou Z; Young J; Montelione GT; Levy RM
Proteins; 2007 Nov; 69(3):449-65. PubMed ID: 17623851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How well can we predict native contacts in proteins based on decoy structures and their energies?
Zhu J; Zhu Q; Shi Y; Liu H
Proteins; 2003 Sep; 52(4):598-608. PubMed ID: 12910459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating the quality of NMR structures by local density of protons.
Ban YE; Rudolph J; Zhou P; Edelsbrunner H
Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):852-64. PubMed ID: 16342274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refinement of NMR structures using implicit solvent and advanced sampling techniques.
Chen J; Im W; Brooks CL
J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Dec; 126(49):16038-47. PubMed ID: 15584737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel high resolution Calpha--Calpha distance dependent force field based on a high quality decoy set.
Rajgaria R; McAllister SR; Floudas CA
Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):726-41. PubMed ID: 16981202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures.
Gunasekaran K; Ramakrishnan C; Balaram P
J Mol Biol; 1996 Nov; 264(1):191-8. PubMed ID: 8950277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]