These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

676 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22223558)

  • 21. Are Healthcare Choices Predictable? The Impact of Discrete Choice Experiment Designs and Models.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Swait JD; Kassahun HT; Bliemer MCJ; Jonker MF; Veldwijk J; Cong K; Rose JM; Donkers B
    Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):1050-1062. PubMed ID: 31511182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An introduction to "discrete choice experiments" for behavior analysts.
    Friedel JE; Foreman AM; Wirth O
    Behav Processes; 2022 May; 198():104628. PubMed ID: 35354088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Respondent Understanding in Discrete Choice Experiments: A Scoping Review.
    Pearce A; Harrison M; Watson V; Street DJ; Howard K; Bansback N; Bryan S
    Patient; 2021 Jan; 14(1):17-53. PubMed ID: 33141359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Labeled versus unlabeled discrete choice experiments in health economics: an application to colorectal cancer screening.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Hol L; Donkers B; van Dam L; Habbema JD; van Leerdam ME; Kuipers EJ; Essink-Bot ML; Steyerberg EW
    Value Health; 2010; 13(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 19912597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Do patients and health care providers have discordant preferences about which aspects of treatments matter most? Evidence from a systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Harrison M; Milbers K; Hudson M; Bansback N
    BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e014719. PubMed ID: 28515194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods for Conducting Stated Preference Research with Children and Adolescents in Health: A Scoping Review of the Application of Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Currie GR; Kennedy BL; MacDonald KV; Marshall DA
    Patient; 2021 Nov; 14(6):741-758. PubMed ID: 34008164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Role of Qualitative Research Methods in Discrete Choice Experiments.
    Vass C; Rigby D; Payne K
    Med Decis Making; 2017 Apr; 37(3):298-313. PubMed ID: 28061040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Reporting Quality of Marginal Rates of Substitution in Discrete Choice Experiments That Elicit Patient Preferences.
    Mott DJ; Chami N; Tervonen T
    Value Health; 2020 Aug; 23(8):979-984. PubMed ID: 32828225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.
    Wright SJ; Vass CM; Sim G; Burton M; Fiebig DG; Payne K
    Patient; 2018 Oct; 11(5):475-488. PubMed ID: 29492903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.
    Ryan M; Gerard K
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2003; 2(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 14619274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Are Efficient Designs Used in Discrete Choice Experiments Too Difficult for Some Respondents? A Case Study Eliciting Preferences for End-of-Life Care.
    Flynn TN; Bilger M; Malhotra C; Finkelstein EA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2016 Mar; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 26589411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Random regret-based discrete-choice modelling: an application to healthcare.
    de Bekker-Grob EW; Chorus CG
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Jul; 31(7):623-34. PubMed ID: 23620214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using discrete choice experiments to understand preferences in health care.
    Pfarr C; Schmid A; Schneider U
    Dev Health Econ Public Policy; 2014; 12():27-48. PubMed ID: 24864381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Using decision mapping to inform the development of a stated choice survey to elicit youth preferences for sexual and reproductive health and HIV services in rural Malawi.
    Michaels-Igbokwe C; Lagarde M; Cairns J; Terris-Prestholt F
    Soc Sci Med; 2014 Mar; 105():93-102. PubMed ID: 24509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Choice experiments in health: the good, the bad, the ugly and toward a brighter future.
    Louviere JJ; Lancsar E
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2009 Oct; 4(Pt 4):527-46. PubMed ID: 19715635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stakeholder Engagement in Designing Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment With Policy Implications: An Example of 2 Swiss Studies on Healthcare Delivery.
    Föhn Z; Nicolet A; Marti J; Kaufmann C; Balthasar A
    Value Health; 2023 Jun; 26(6):925-933. PubMed ID: 36646277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Discrete Choice Experiments: A Guide to Model Specification, Estimation and Software.
    Lancsar E; Fiebig DG; Hole AR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Jul; 35(7):697-716. PubMed ID: 28374325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision-makers' preferences for approving new medicines in Wales: a discrete-choice experiment with assessment of external validity.
    Linley WG; Hughes DA
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2013 Apr; 31(4):345-55. PubMed ID: 23516033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Current Practices for Accounting for Preference Heterogeneity in Health-Related Discrete Choice Experiments: A Systematic Review.
    Karim S; Craig BM; Vass C; Groothuis-Oudshoorn CGM
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2022 Oct; 40(10):943-956. PubMed ID: 35960434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.