179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22223722)
1. A new mammography dosimetric phantom.
Almeida CD; Coutinho CM; Dantas BM; Peixoto JE; Koch HA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):196-8. PubMed ID: 22223722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric characterization of a dedicated breast computed tomography clinical prototype.
Sechopoulos I; Feng SS; D'Orsi CJ
Med Phys; 2010 Aug; 37(8):4110-20. PubMed ID: 20879571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dosimetric characterization and organ dose assessment in digital breast tomosynthesis: Measurements and Monte Carlo simulations using voxel phantoms.
Baptista M; Di Maria S; Barros S; Figueira C; Sarmento M; Orvalho L; Vaz P
Med Phys; 2015 Jul; 42(7):3788-800. PubMed ID: 26133581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast composition and radiographic breast equivalence.
McLean D
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Mar; 20(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 9141308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Estimating mean glandular dose using proprietary mammography phantoms.
Hartley LD; Cobb BJ; Hutchinson DE
Appl Radiat Isot; 1999 Jan; 50(1):205-13. PubMed ID: 10028638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients.
Klein R; Aichinger H; Dierker J; Jansen JT; Joite-Barfuss S; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Zoetelief J
Phys Med Biol; 1997 Apr; 42(4):651-71. PubMed ID: 9127443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Monte Carlo simulation for the estimation of the glandular breast dose for a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Rodrigues L; Magalhaes LA; Braz D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Dec; 167(4):576-83. PubMed ID: 25480841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Variations in breast doses for an automatic mammography unit.
Bor D; Tükel S; Olgar T; Aydin E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2008 Sep; 14(3):122-6. PubMed ID: 18814131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: Glandular dose estimation using a Monte Carlo code and voxel phantom.
Tzamicha E; Yakoumakis E; Tsalafoutas IA; Dimitriadis A; Georgiou E; Tsapaki V; Chalazonitis A
Phys Med; 2015 Nov; 31(7):785-91. PubMed ID: 25900891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detectability comparison between a high energy x-ray phase sensitive and mammography systems in imaging phantoms with varying glandular-adipose ratios.
Ghani MU; Wong MD; Wu D; Zheng B; Fajardo LL; Yan A; Fuh J; Wu X; Liu H
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3523-3538. PubMed ID: 28379851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast dosimetry using high-resolution voxel phantoms.
Dance DR; Hunt RA; Bakic PR; Maidment AD; Sandborg M; Ullman G; Alm Carlsson G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):359-63. PubMed ID: 15933137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammography dosimetry using an in-house developed polymethyl methacrylate phantom.
Sharma R; Sharma SD; Mayya YS; Chourasiya G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(2):379-85. PubMed ID: 22232773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Additional factors for the estimation of mean glandular breast dose using the UK mammography dosimetry protocol.
Dance DR; Skinner CL; Young KC; Beckett JR; Kotre CJ
Phys Med Biol; 2000 Nov; 45(11):3225-40. PubMed ID: 11098900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suitability of low density materials for 3D printing of physical breast phantoms.
Ivanov D; Bliznakova K; Buliev I; Popov P; Mettivier G; Russo P; Di Lillo F; Sarno A; Vignero J; Bosmans H; Bravin A; Bliznakov Z
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(17):175020. PubMed ID: 29999497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT.
Boone JM; Kwan AL; Seibert JA; Shah N; Lindfors KK; Nelson TR
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3767-76. PubMed ID: 16475776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantification of breast density using dual-energy mammography with liquid phantom calibration.
Lam AR; Ding H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(14):3985-4000. PubMed ID: 24971873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Composition of mammographic phantom materials.
Geise RA; Palchevsky A
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):347-50. PubMed ID: 8596830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Glandular dose indices using a glandular dose to air kerma volume histogram in mammography.
Shinohara S; Araki F; Ohno T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1340-1348. PubMed ID: 31859402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of mean glandular dose values provided by a digital breast tomosynthesis system in Brazil.
Beraldo Oliveira B; Paixão L; Donato da Silva S; Teixeira MH; Nogueira Mdo S
Appl Radiat Isot; 2015 Jun; 100():91-5. PubMed ID: 25457188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
