258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22223890)
1. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH; Carney AE; Nelson DA
J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Feb; 113(2):961-8. PubMed ID: 12597189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of fluctuating maskers on speech understanding of high-performing cochlear implant users.
Zirn S; Polterauer D; Keller S; Hemmert W
Int J Audiol; 2016; 55(5):295-304. PubMed ID: 26865377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Spectral Resolution and Frequency Mismatch on Speech Understanding and Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Bilateral Cochlear Implants.
Xu K; Willis S; Gopen Q; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1362-1371. PubMed ID: 32132377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Music perception by cochlear implant and normal hearing listeners as measured by the Montreal Battery for Evaluation of Amusia.
Cooper WB; Tobey E; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):618-26. PubMed ID: 18469714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Masking release and modulation interference in cochlear implant and simulation listeners.
Jin SH; Nie Y; Nelson P
Am J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 22(1):135-46. PubMed ID: 23800809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Speech Recognition With Informational and Energetic Maskers in Patients With Single-Sided Deafness After Cochlear Implantation.
Müller V; Lang-Roth R
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Aug; 64(8):3343-3356. PubMed ID: 34310192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Music perception and appraisal: cochlear implant users and simulated cochlear implant listening.
Wright R; Uchanski RM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):350-65; quiz 379. PubMed ID: 22533978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.
Başkent D; van Engelshoven S; Galvin JJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL147-53. PubMed ID: 24606308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of priming on energetic and informational masking in a same-different task.
Jones JA; Freyman RL
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):124-33. PubMed ID: 21841488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cochlear implant speech recognition with speech maskers.
Stickney GS; Zeng FG; Litovsky R; Assmann P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Aug; 116(2):1081-91. PubMed ID: 15376674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of age and hearing impairment on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral modulation.
Hall JW; Buss E; Grose JH; Roush PA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):340-8. PubMed ID: 22237164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.
Ihlefeld A; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Carlyon RP
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1315-24. PubMed ID: 22352505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting speech understanding in gated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Nelson PB; Jin SH
J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 May; 115(5 Pt 1):2286-94. PubMed ID: 15139640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear Implant Facilitates the Use of Talker Sex and Spatial Cues to Segregate Competing Speech in Unilaterally Deaf Listeners.
Chen J; Shi Y; Kong Y; Chen B; Zhang L; Galvin JJ; Li Y; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2023 Jan-Feb 01; 44(1):77-91. PubMed ID: 35733275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Effects of Musical Training on Speech Detection in the Presence of Informational and Energetic Masking.
Morse-Fortier C; Parrish MM; Baran JA; Freyman RL
Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517739427. PubMed ID: 29161982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
