These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22224822)

  • 21. Test-induced priming impairs source monitoring accuracy in the DRM procedure.
    Dewhurst SA; Knott LM; Howe ML
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):1001-7. PubMed ID: 21480753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stroop-like effects in a new-code learning task: A cognitive load theory perspective.
    Hazan-Liran B; Miller P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1878-1891. PubMed ID: 27434675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of associative and semantic priming in the lexical decision task.
    Perea M; Rosa E
    Psychol Res; 2002 Aug; 66(3):180-94. PubMed ID: 12192447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The sensory nature of knowledge: Sensory priming effects in semantic categorization.
    Brunel L; Lesourd M; Labeye E; Versace R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):955-64. PubMed ID: 19787552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Looking at anything that is green when hearing "frog": how object surface colour and stored object colour knowledge influence language-mediated overt attention.
    Huettig F; Altmann GT
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jan; 64(1):122-45. PubMed ID: 20521211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interactive activation in visual word recognition: constraints imposed by the joint effects of spatial attention and semantics.
    Stolz JA; Stevanovski B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1064-76. PubMed ID: 15584815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Phonological facilitation from pictures in a word association task: evidence for routine cascaded processing in spoken word production.
    Humphreys KR; Boyd CH; Watter S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2289-96. PubMed ID: 20737355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Attention, spatial integration, and the tail of response time distributions in Stroop task performance.
    Roelofs A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(1):135-50. PubMed ID: 21936655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. How yellow is your banana? Toddlers' language-mediated visual search in referent-present tasks.
    Mani N; Johnson E; McQueen JM; Huettig F
    Dev Psychol; 2013 Jun; 49(6):1036-44. PubMed ID: 22845828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Transitions between color categories mapped with a reverse Stroop task.
    Smithson HE; Khan SS; Sharpe LT; Stockman A
    Vis Neurosci; 2006; 23(3-4):453-60. PubMed ID: 16961980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Grammatical priming of visual word recognition in fourth-grade children.
    Bowey JA
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):1005-23. PubMed ID: 8962545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production.
    Hantsch A; Jescheniak JD; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1443-53. PubMed ID: 19857015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociating stimulus-stimulus and response-response effects in the Stroop task.
    Schmidt JR; Cheesman J
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2005 Jun; 59(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 16035346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A time course analysis of the synesthetic colour priming effect.
    Spruyt A; Koch J; Vandromme H; Hermans D; Eelen P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Sep; 63(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 19739904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Varying temporal contiguity and interference in a human avoidance task.
    Costa DS; Boakes RA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Jan; 37(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 21261416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency.
    Schmidt JR; Besner D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):514-23. PubMed ID: 18444752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Contiguity and the outcome density bias in action-outcome contingency judgements.
    Vallée-Tourangeau F; Murphy RA; Baker AG
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Apr; 58(2):177-92. PubMed ID: 16095045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.