These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22225296)

  • 21. Phantom study to evaluate contrast-medium-enhanced digital subtraction mammography with a full-field indirect-detection system.
    Palma BA; Rosado-Méndez I; Villaseñor Y; Brandan ME
    Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):577-89. PubMed ID: 20229866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are phantoms useful for predicting the potential of dose reduction in full-field digital mammography?
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Apr; 50(8):1851-70. PubMed ID: 15815100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of the accuracy of film-screen mammography, full-field digital mammography, and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Michell MJ; Iqbal A; Wasan RK; Evans DR; Peacock C; Lawinski CP; Douiri A; Wilson R; Whelehan P
    Clin Radiol; 2012 Oct; 67(10):976-81. PubMed ID: 22625656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
    Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
    Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Is full-field digital mammography more accurate than screen-film mammography in overall population screening? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Souza FH; Wendland EM; Rosa MI; Polanczyk CA
    Breast; 2013 Jun; 22(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 23489759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of breast arterial calcification using full field digital mammography.
    Molloi S; Xu T; Ducote J; Iribarren C
    Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1428-39. PubMed ID: 18491538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Visualization of microcalcifications on mammographies obtained by digital full-field mammography in comparison to conventional film-screen mammography].
    Diekmann S; Bick U; von Heyden H; Diekmann F
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):775-9. PubMed ID: 12811689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A volumetric method for estimation of breast density on digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Pawluczyk O; Augustine BJ; Yaffe MJ; Rico D; Yang J; Mawdsley GE; Boyd NF
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):352-64. PubMed ID: 12674236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Intra-individual comparison of average glandular dose of two digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.
    Engelken FJ; Meyer H; Juran R; Bick U; Fallenberg E; Diekmann F
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Oct; 16(10):1272-80. PubMed ID: 19632866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
    Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
    Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic population.
    Seo BK; Pisano ED; Kuzmiak CM; Koomen M; Pavic D; McLelland R; Lee Y; Cole EB; Mattingly D; Lee J
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 16979072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Applicability of ACR breast dosimetry methodology to a digital mammography system.
    Tomon JJ; Johnson TE; Swenson KN; Schauer DA
    Med Phys; 2006 Mar; 33(3):799-807. PubMed ID: 16878582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A critical comparison of three full field digital mammography systems using figure of merit.
    Kanaga KC; Yap HH; Laila SE; Sulaiman T; Zaharah M; Shantini AA
    Med J Malaysia; 2010 Jun; 65(2):119-22. PubMed ID: 23756795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography.
    Williams MB; Raghunathan P; More MJ; Seibert JA; Kwan A; Lo JY; Samei E; Ranger NT; Fajardo LL; McGruder A; McGruder SM; Maidment AD; Yaffe MJ; Bloomquist A; Mawdsley GE
    Med Phys; 2008 Jun; 35(6):2414-23. PubMed ID: 18649474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Full-field digital mammography: dose-dependent detectability of breast lesions and microcalcinosis].
    Obenauer S; Hermann KP; Schorn C; Fischer U; Grabbe E
    Rofo; 2000 Dec; 172(12):1052-6. PubMed ID: 11199434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Automatic technique parameter selection on a digital mammography system: an evaluation of SNR and CNR as a function of AGD on a GE senographe DS.
    Thomson FJ
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2006 Sep; 29(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 17058586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A novel physical anthropomorphic breast phantom for 2D and 3D x-ray imaging.
    Ikejimba LC; Graff CG; Rosenthal S; Badal A; Ghammraoui B; Lo JY; Glick SJ
    Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):407-416. PubMed ID: 27992059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A method to measure paddle and detector pressures and footprints in mammography.
    Hogg P; Szczepura K; Darlington A; Maxwell A
    Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041907. PubMed ID: 23556901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of digital mammography and screen-film mammography in breast cancer screening: a review in the Irish breast screening program.
    Hambly NM; McNicholas MM; Phelan N; Hargaden GC; O'Doherty A; Flanagan FL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Oct; 193(4):1010-8. PubMed ID: 19770323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.