These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22225547)

  • 1. Exploring mixed microbial community functioning: recent advances in metaproteomics.
    Siggins A; Gunnigle E; Abram F
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2012 May; 80(2):265-80. PubMed ID: 22225547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marine metaproteomics: current status and future directions.
    Wang DZ; Xie ZX; Zhang SF
    J Proteomics; 2014 Jan; 97():27-35. PubMed ID: 24041543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decade of metaproteomics: where we stand and what the future holds.
    Wilmes P; Heintz-Buschart A; Bond PL
    Proteomics; 2015 Oct; 15(20):3409-17. PubMed ID: 26315987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Metaproteomics to unravel major microbial players in leaf litter and soil environments: challenges and perspectives.
    Becher D; Bernhardt J; Fuchs S; Riedel K
    Proteomics; 2013 Oct; 13(18-19):2895-909. PubMed ID: 23894095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soil and leaf litter metaproteomics-a brief guideline from sampling to understanding.
    Keiblinger KM; Fuchs S; Zechmeister-Boltenstern S; Riedel K
    FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2016 Nov; 92(11):. PubMed ID: 27549116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Applications of soil metaproteomics in soil pollution assessment: a review].
    Zhang X; Li F; Liu TT; Chen YX
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2012 Oct; 23(10):2923-30. PubMed ID: 23359959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental Microbial Community Proteomics: Status, Challenges and Perspectives.
    Wang DZ; Kong LF; Li YY; Xie ZX
    Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Aug; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 27527164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combining "omics" strategies to analyze the biotechnological potential of complex microbial environments.
    de Castro AP; Sartori da Silva MR; Quirino BF; Kruger RH
    Curr Protein Pept Sci; 2013 Sep; 14(6):447-58. PubMed ID: 23968355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Practical considerations for sampling and data analysis in contemporary metagenomics-based environmental studies.
    Staley C; Sadowsky MJ
    J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Nov; 154():14-18. PubMed ID: 30287354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Metaproteomic data analysis at a glance: advances in computational microbial community proteomics.
    Muth T; Renard BY; Martens L
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2016 Aug; 13(8):757-69. PubMed ID: 27376173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proteomic tools to decipher microbial community structure and functioning.
    Arsène-Ploetze F; Bertin PN; Carapito C
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Sep; 22(18):13599-612. PubMed ID: 25475614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing metaproteomics--The value of models and defined environmental microbial systems.
    Herbst FA; Lünsmann V; Kjeldal H; Jehmlich N; Tholey A; von Bergen M; Nielsen JL; Hettich RL; Seifert J; Nielsen PH
    Proteomics; 2016 Mar; 16(5):783-98. PubMed ID: 26621789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Function is what counts: how microbial community complexity affects species, proteome and pathway coverage in metaproteomics.
    Lohmann P; Schäpe SS; Haange SB; Oliphant K; Allen-Vercoe E; Jehmlich N; Von Bergen M
    Expert Rev Proteomics; 2020 Feb; 17(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 32174200
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metaproteomics: a new approach for studying functional microbial ecology.
    Maron PA; Ranjard L; Mougel C; Lemanceau P
    Microb Ecol; 2007 Apr; 53(3):486-93. PubMed ID: 17431707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental proteomics: applications of proteome profiling in environmental microbiology and biotechnology.
    Lacerda CM; Reardon KF
    Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic; 2009 Jan; 8(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 19279070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genomics as a potential tool to unravel the rhizosphere microbiome interactions on plant health.
    Priya P; Aneesh B; Harikrishnan K
    J Microbiol Methods; 2021 Jun; 185():106215. PubMed ID: 33839214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Challenges and perspectives of metaproteomic data analysis.
    Heyer R; Schallert K; Zoun R; Becher B; Saake G; Benndorf D
    J Biotechnol; 2017 Nov; 261():24-36. PubMed ID: 28663049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soil Metaproteomics for the Study of the Relationships Between Microorganisms and Plants: A Review of Extraction Protocols and Ecological Insights.
    Tartaglia M; Bastida F; Sciarrillo R; Guarino C
    Int J Mol Sci; 2020 Nov; 21(22):. PubMed ID: 33187080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Systems biology: Functional analysis of natural microbial consortia using community proteomics.
    VerBerkmoes NC; Denef VJ; Hettich RL; Banfield JF
    Nat Rev Microbiol; 2009 Mar; 7(3):196-205. PubMed ID: 19219053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using proteins to study how microbes contribute to soil ecosystem services: The current state and future perspectives of soil metaproteomics.
    Starke R; Jehmlich N; Bastida F
    J Proteomics; 2019 Apr; 198():50-58. PubMed ID: 30445181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.