These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22225584)
1. Estimation of genetic parameters and response to selection for a continuous trait subject to culling before testing. Arnason T; Albertsdóttir E; Fikse WF; Eriksson S; Sigurdsson A J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 22225584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bayesian prediction of breeding values for multivariate binary and continuous traits in simulated horse populations using threshold-linear models with Gibbs sampling. Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I Animal; 2008 Jan; 2(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 22444958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for multivariate threshold and continuous data in a simulated horse population using Gibbs sampling and residual maximum likelihood. Stock KF; Hoeschele I; Distl O J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Oct; 124(5):308-19. PubMed ID: 17868084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation study on covariance component estimation for two binary traits in an underlying continuous scale. Mäntysaari EA; Quaas RL; Gröhn YT J Dairy Sci; 1991 Feb; 74(2):580-91. PubMed ID: 2045564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bayesian estimation of genetic parameters for multivariate threshold and continuous phenotypes and molecular genetic data in simulated horse populations using Gibbs sampling. Stock KF; Distl O; Hoeschele I BMC Genet; 2007 May; 8():19. PubMed ID: 17490471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimum contribution selection using traditional best linear unbiased prediction and genomic breeding values in aquaculture breeding schemes. Nielsen HM; Sonesson AK; Meuwissen TH J Anim Sci; 2011 Mar; 89(3):630-8. PubMed ID: 21036937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining genetic test information and correlated phenotypic records for breeding value estimation. Spangler ML; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R J Anim Sci; 2007 Mar; 85(3):641-9. PubMed ID: 17085722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of selection index calculations to determine selection strategies in genomic breeding programs. König S; Swalve HH J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5292-303. PubMed ID: 19762847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation. Fikse WF J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A classical Mendelian cross-breeding study of the Naples high and low excitability rat lines. Gironi Carnevale UA; Vitullo E; Varriale B; Ruocco LA; Sadile AG Behav Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 183(2):130-40. PubMed ID: 17643502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of population structure on estimates of direct and maternal parameters. Heydarpour M; Schaeffer LR; Yazdi MH J Anim Breed Genet; 2008 Apr; 125(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 18363974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Genetic analysis of 'breeding field test status' in Icelandic horses. Albertsdóttir E; Eriksson S; Sigurdsson Á; Árnason T J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Apr; 128(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 21385227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multiple-trait selection for radiographic health of the limbs, conformation and performance in Warmblood riding horses. Stock KF; Distl O Animal; 2008 Dec; 2(12):1724-32. PubMed ID: 22444077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bivariate analysis of liability to clinical mastitis and to culling in first-lactation cows. Heringstad B; Rekaya R; Gianola D; Klemetsdal G; Weigel KA J Dairy Sci; 2003 Feb; 86(2):653-60. PubMed ID: 12647971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of restricted maximum likelihood and method R for estimating heritability and predicting breeding value under selection. Cantet RJ; Birchmeier AN; Santos-Cristal MG; de Avila VS J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2554-60. PubMed ID: 11048920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of inaccurate parameter estimates on genetic response to marker-assisted selection in an outbred population. Spelman RJ; van Arendonk JA J Dairy Sci; 1997 Dec; 80(12):3399-410. PubMed ID: 9436122 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Natural selection, evolvability and bias due to environmental covariance in the field in an annual plant. Winn AA J Evol Biol; 2004 Sep; 17(5):1073-83. PubMed ID: 15312079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic relationship between longevity and objectively or subjectively assessed performance traits in sheep using linear censored models. Mekkawy W; Roehe R; Lewis RM; Davies MH; Bünger L; Simm G; Haresign W J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3482-9. PubMed ID: 19648485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Weighting factors of sire daughter information in international genetic evaluations. Fikse WF; Banos G J Dairy Sci; 2001 Jul; 84(7):1759-67. PubMed ID: 11467826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Estimation of genetic parameters based on individual and group mean records in laying hens. Nurgiartiningsih VM; Mielenz N; Preisinger R; Schmutz M; Schueler L Br Poult Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 15623212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]