These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22225584)

  • 21. Effects of integrated genetic evaluations for Icelandic horses on predictive ability, accuracy and selection bias.
    Albertsdóttir E; Arnason T; Eriksson S; Sigurdsson A; Fikse WF
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2012 Feb; 129(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 22225583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Heritability, reliability of genetic evaluations and response to selection in proportional hazard models.
    Yazdi MH; Visscher PM; Ducrocq V; Thompson R
    J Dairy Sci; 2002 Jun; 85(6):1563-77. PubMed ID: 12146489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference.
    Van Tassell CP; Van Vleck LD
    J Anim Sci; 1996 Nov; 74(11):2586-97. PubMed ID: 8923173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. "Quasi-REML" correlation estimates between production and health traits in the presence of selection and confounding: a simulation study.
    Gates P; Johansson K; Danell B
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Mar; 77(3):558-68. PubMed ID: 10229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of autoregressive covariance structures for test-day records of Holstein cows: estimates of parameters.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Jul; 88(7):2632-42. PubMed ID: 15956325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters.
    Muir WM
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Dec; 124(6):342-55. PubMed ID: 18076471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bayesian inference for categorical traits with an application to variance component estimation.
    Luo MF; Boettcher PJ; Schaeffer LR; Dekkers JC
    J Dairy Sci; 2001 Mar; 84(3):694-704. PubMed ID: 11286423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The efficiency of genome-wide selection for genetic improvement of net merit.
    Togashi K; Lin CY; Yamazaki T
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Oct; 89(10):2972-80. PubMed ID: 21512116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impacts of cytoplasmic inheritance on genetic evaluations.
    Boettcher PJ; Kuhn MT; Freeman AE
    J Dairy Sci; 1996 Apr; 79(4):663-75. PubMed ID: 8744232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population.
    Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP
    J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multi-trait animal model estimation of genetic parameters for linear type and gait traits in the Belgian warmblood horse.
    Rustin M; Janssens S; Buys N; Gengler N
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Oct; 126(5):378-86. PubMed ID: 19765164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Genetic parameters for residual feed intake in growing pigs, with emphasis on genetic relationships with carcass and meat quality traits.
    Gilbert H; Bidanel JP; Gruand J; Caritez JC; Billon Y; Guillouet P; Lagant H; Noblet J; Sellier P
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Dec; 85(12):3182-8. PubMed ID: 17785600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Animal model and multiple trait BLUP applied in poultry genetic evaluation].
    Pang H; Wu CX; Zhang Y; Gong GF; Bi YH
    Yi Chuan Xue Bao; 1989; 16(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 2486251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genetics of litter size in three maternal lines of rabbits: repeatability versus multiple-trait models.
    Piles M; García ML; Rafel O; Ramon J; Baselga M
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Sep; 84(9):2309-15. PubMed ID: 16908633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model.
    Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Genetic progress in multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes using genetic markers.
    Schrooten C; Bovenhuis H; van Arendonk JA; Bijma P
    J Dairy Sci; 2005 Apr; 88(4):1569-81. PubMed ID: 15778327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of genetic selection on management of boar replacement.
    Robinson JA; Buhr MM
    Theriogenology; 2005 Jan; 63(2):668-78. PubMed ID: 15626424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Genetic-statistical analysis of environmental and genetic influences on the outcome of the juvenile and breeding performance tests for behaviour traits in Hovawart dogs].
    Boenigk K; Hamann H; Distl O
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2006; 119(5-6):258-69. PubMed ID: 16729474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study.
    Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R
    J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity.
    Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.