These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Polyandry produces sexy sons at the cost of daughters in red flour beetles. Pai A; Yan G Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Feb; 269(1489):361-8. PubMed ID: 11886623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness. Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex allocation and interactions between relatives in the bean beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. Reece SE; Wherry RN; Bloor JM Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):282-8. PubMed ID: 16150553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sexual selection favors female-biased sex ratios: the balance between the opposing forces of sex-ratio selection and sexual selection. Wade MJ; Shuster SM; Demuth JP Am Nat; 2003 Oct; 162(4):403-14. PubMed ID: 14582004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A sex allocation theory for vertebrates: combining local resource competition and condition-dependent allocation. Wild G; West SA Am Nat; 2007 Nov; 170(5):E112-28. PubMed ID: 17926288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postcopulatory fertilization bias as a form of cryptic sexual selection. Calsbeek R; Bonneaud C Evolution; 2008 May; 62(5):1137-48. PubMed ID: 18298641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cross-fostering eggs reveals that female collared flycatchers adjust clutch sex ratios according to parental ability to invest in offspring. Bowers EK; Munclinger P; Bureš S; Kučerová L; Nádvorník P; Krist M Mol Ecol; 2013 Jan; 22(1):215-28. PubMed ID: 23116299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intralocus sexual conflict. van Doorn GS Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jun; 1168():52-71. PubMed ID: 19566703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles. Fedina TY; Lewis SM Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outbreeding depression, but no inbreeding depression in haplodiploid Ambrosia beetles with regular sibling mating. Peer K; Taborsky M Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 15807418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Males influence maternal effects that promote sexual selection: a quantitative genetic experiment with dung beetles Onthophagus taurus. Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Hunt J; Tomkins JL Am Nat; 2003 Jun; 161(6):852-9. PubMed ID: 12858271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evidence for strong intralocus sexual conflict in the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella. Lewis Z; Wedell N; Hunt J Evolution; 2011 Jul; 65(7):2085-97. PubMed ID: 21729062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No fecundity cost of female secondary sexual trait expression in the horned beetle Onthophagus sagittarius. Simmons LW; Emlen DJ J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 18631210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Conflict over multiple-partner mating between males and females of the polygynandrous common lizards. Fitze PS; Le Galliard JF; Federici P; Richard M; Clobert J Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2451-9. PubMed ID: 16396185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. No apparent indirect genetic benefits to female red flour beetles preferring males with intense copulatory courtship. Edvardsson M; Arnqvist G Behav Genet; 2006 Sep; 36(5):775-82. PubMed ID: 16557363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Testing for direct and indirect effects of mate choice by manipulating female choosiness. Maklakov AA; Arnqvist G Curr Biol; 2009 Dec; 19(22):1903-6. PubMed ID: 19853448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]