292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22226435)
1. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
Mutlu H; Sivrioglu AK; Sonmez G; Velioglu M; Sildiroglu HO; Basekim CC; Kizilkaya E
Clin Imaging; 2012; 36(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22226435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diffusion-weighted images differentiate benign from malignant thyroid nodules.
Erdem G; Erdem T; Muammer H; Mutlu DY; Firat AK; Sahin I; Alkan A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 20027577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the characterization of hepatocellular carcinomas and dysplastic nodules in cirrhotic liver.
Xu PJ; Yan FH; Wang JH; Shan Y; Ji Y; Chen CZ
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010 Jul; 34(4):506-12. PubMed ID: 20657216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Higher sensitivity and specificity for diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant lung lesions without apparent diffusion coefficient quantification.
Uto T; Takehara Y; Nakamura Y; Naito T; Hashimoto D; Inui N; Suda T; Nakamura H; Chida K
Radiology; 2009 Jul; 252(1):247-54. PubMed ID: 19420317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pediatric abdominal masses: diagnostic accuracy of diffusion weighted MRI.
Kocaoglu M; Bulakbasi N; Sanal HT; Kismet E; Caliskan B; Akgun V; Tayfun C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 28(5):629-36. PubMed ID: 20378294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for characterization of focal liver masses: impact of parallel imaging (SENSE) and b value.
Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Sano K; Motosugi U; Sou H; Araki T
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(6):865-71. PubMed ID: 19204445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
Fujii S; Kakite S; Nishihara K; Kanasaki Y; Harada T; Kigawa J; Kaminou T; Ogawa T
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 28(5):1149-56. PubMed ID: 18972356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lymphomas and glioblastomas: differences in the apparent diffusion coefficient evaluated with high b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T.
Doskaliyev A; Yamasaki F; Ohtaki M; Kajiwara Y; Takeshima Y; Watanabe Y; Takayasu T; Amatya VJ; Akiyama Y; Sugiyama K; Kurisu K
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Feb; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 21129872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: the influence of the choice of b-values.
Peters NH; Vincken KL; van den Bosch MA; Luijten PR; Mali WP; Bartels LW
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 May; 31(5):1100-5. PubMed ID: 20432344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between two-point and four-point methods for quantification of apparent diffusion coefficient of normal liver parenchyma and focal lesions. Value of normalization with spleen.
Papanikolaou N; Gourtsoyianni S; Yarmenitis S; Maris T; Gourtsoyiannis N
Eur J Radiol; 2010 Feb; 73(2):305-9. PubMed ID: 19091503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the liver: optimizing b value for the detection and characterization of benign and malignant hepatic lesions.
Goshima S; Kanematsu M; Kondo H; Yokoyama R; Kajita K; Tsuge Y; Watanabe H; Shiratori Y; Onozuka M; Moriyama N
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):691-7. PubMed ID: 18777553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Tissue characterization of head and neck lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging with SPLICE.
Sakamoto J; Yoshino N; Okochi K; Imaizumi A; Tetsumura A; Kurohara K; Kurabayashi T
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Feb; 69(2):260-8. PubMed ID: 18023549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. High b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging of normal brain at 3T.
Cihangiroglu M; Uluğ AM; Firat Z; Bayram A; Kovanlikaya A; Kovanlikaya I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 69(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18162352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurement for discrimination of focal benign and malignant hepatic masses.
Kilickesmez O; Bayramoglu S; Inci E; Cimilli T
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2009 Feb; 53(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 19453528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI: a valuable tool for differentiating primary parotid gland tumors?
Habermann CR; Gossrau P; Graessner J; Arndt C; Cramer MC; Reitmeier F; Jaehne M; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Jul; 177(7):940-5. PubMed ID: 15973595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the characterization of cystic pancreatic lesions: usefulness of ADC values.
Boraschi P; Donati F; Gigoni R; Salemi S; Bartolozzi C; Falaschi F
Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1447-55. PubMed ID: 20864287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diffusion-weighted imaging of primary brain lymphomas: effect of ADC value and signal intensity of T2-weighted imaging.
Akter M; Hirai T; Makino K; Kitajima M; Murakami R; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2008 Oct; 32(7):539-43. PubMed ID: 18617368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiation between malignant and benign solitary thyroid nodules.
Razek AA; Sadek AG; Kombar OR; Elmahdy TE; Nada N
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2008 Mar; 29(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 18039755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted MRI of malignant pleural mesothelioma: preliminary assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient in histologic subtypes.
Gill RR; Umeoka S; Mamata H; Tilleman TR; Stanwell P; Woodhams R; Padera RF; Sugarbaker DJ; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):W125-30. PubMed ID: 20651171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted imaging of mucinous carcinoma of the breast: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient and signal intensity in correlation with histologic findings.
Woodhams R; Kakita S; Hata H; Iwabuchi K; Umeoka S; Mountford CE; Hatabu H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 19542422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
