These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks. Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Protecting people against radiation exposure in the event of a radiological attack. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection. Valentin J; Ann ICRP; 2005; 35(1):1-110, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16164984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans. Akiba S J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiation and your patient: a guide for medical practitioners. Ann ICRP; 2001; 31(4):5-31. PubMed ID: 12685757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Communication of benefits and risks of medical radiation: a historical perspective. Timins JK Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):562-5. PubMed ID: 21979541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsible use of advanced imaging technology. How well are risks and benefits of radiation recognised? Wijetunga C; Brady Z; Varma DK Injury; 2018 May; 49(5):883-884. PubMed ID: 29716724 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk of thyroid cancer after adult radiation exposure: time to re-assess? Mabuchi K; Hatch M; Little MP; Linet MS; Simon SL Radiat Res; 2013 Feb; 179(2):254-6. PubMed ID: 23252377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Communicating the harmful effects of radiation exposure from medical imaging: malpractice considerations. Berlin L Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101(5):583-8. PubMed ID: 21979545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saving lives and changing family histories: appropriate counseling of pregnant women and men and women of reproductive age, concerning the risk of diagnostic radiation exposures during and before pregnancy. Brent RL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Jan; 200(1):4-24. PubMed ID: 19121655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks]. Tubiana M Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reducing patient exposure to ionizing radiation--is it really necessary? Thomas RH; Busick DD Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Nov; 37(11):657-64. PubMed ID: 1033663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Risk of radiation-related cancer following exposure to diagnostic radiation]. Kai M Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Sep; 64(7 Suppl):11-5. PubMed ID: 15688738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Significance of radiation dose in medical imaging. Hansen RA Minn Med; 2009 Dec; 92(12):42-4. PubMed ID: 20092172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on background radiation doses measured by control dosimeters in Japan. Romanyukha A; King DL; Kennemur LK Health Phys; 2012 May; 102(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 22469931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]