These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22227301)

  • 1. An impact assessment methodology for urban surface runoff quality following best practice treatment.
    Ellis JB; Revitt DM; Lundy L
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Feb; 416():172-9. PubMed ID: 22227301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mapping hazard from urban non-point pollution: a screening model to support sustainable urban drainage planning.
    Mitchell G
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Jan; 74(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 15572076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The management of urban surface water flood risks: SUDS performance in flood reduction from extreme events.
    Viavattene C; Ellis JB
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(1):99-108. PubMed ID: 23128626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDS) treatment train assessment tool.
    Jefferies C; Duffy A; Berwick N; McLean N; Hemingway A
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(5):1233-40. PubMed ID: 19717910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A GIS-based methodology for selecting stormwater disconnection opportunities.
    Moore SL; Stovin VR; Wall M; Ashley RM
    Water Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 22699330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Emission standards versus immission standards for assessing the impact of urban drainage on ephemeral receiving water bodies.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(6):1617-29. PubMed ID: 20351441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A geographic information system screening tool to tackle diffuse pollution through the use of sustainable drainage systems.
    Todorovic Z; Breton NP
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(10):2066-73. PubMed ID: 24845322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prioritising and planning of urban stormwater treatment in the Alna watercourse in Oslo.
    Nordeidet B; Nordeide T; Astebøl SO; Hvitved-Jacobsen T
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():231-8. PubMed ID: 15504510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk based urban watershed management under conflicting objectives.
    Novotny V; Clark D; Griffin RJ; Booth D
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):69-78. PubMed ID: 11379158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multicriteria decision approaches to support sustainable drainage options for the treatment of highway and urban runoff.
    Ellis JB; Deutsch JC; Mouchel JM; Scholes L; Revitt MD
    Sci Total Environ; 2004 Dec; 334-335():251-60. PubMed ID: 15504512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Urban drainage redefined: from stormwater removal to integrated management.
    Chocat B; Krebs P; Marsalek J; Rauch W; Schilling W
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(5):61-8. PubMed ID: 11379157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The best management of SuDS treatment trains: a holistic approach.
    Bastien N; Arthur S; Wallis S; Scholz M
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(1):263-72. PubMed ID: 20057113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection and mapping of water pollution variation in the Nile Delta using multivariate clustering and GIS techniques.
    Shaban M; Urban B; El Saadi A; Faisal M
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Aug; 91(8):1785-93. PubMed ID: 20413208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uncertainty in urban stormwater quality modelling: the influence of likelihood measure formulation in the GLUE methodology.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 19819524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Storm water management in an urban catchment: effects of source control and real-time management of sewer systems on receiving water quality.
    Frehmann T; Nafo I; Niemann A; Geiger WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(6-7):19-26. PubMed ID: 12380970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An integrated approach for urban water quality assessment.
    Beenen AS; Langeveld JG; Liefting HJ; Aalderink RH; Velthorst H
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(7):1519-26. PubMed ID: 22179651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advances in urban-drainage management and flood protection.
    Verworn HR
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2002 Jul; 360(1796):1451-60. PubMed ID: 12804259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of a multi-criteria index ranking system for urban runoff best management practices (BMPs) selection.
    Jia H; Yao H; Tang Y; Yu SL; Zhen JX; Lu Y
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Sep; 185(9):7915-33. PubMed ID: 23446886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of real time control of sewer systems on treatment plant performance and receiving water quality.
    Frehmann T; Niemann A; Ustohal P; Geiger WF
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(3):229-37. PubMed ID: 11902474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Urban water quality modelling: a parsimonious holistic approach for a complex real case study.
    Freni G; Mannina G; Viviani G
    Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(2):521-36. PubMed ID: 20107280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.