115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2222768)
1. Clinical applications of a CT-simulator: precision treatment planning and portal marking in breast cancer.
Heidtman CM
Med Dosim; 1990; 15(3):113-7. PubMed ID: 2222768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Design of a fully integrated three-dimensional computed tomography simulator and preliminary clinical evaluation.
Perez CA; Purdy JA; Harms W; Gerber R; Matthews J; Grigsby PW; Graham ML; Emami B; Lee HK; Michalski JM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1994 Nov; 30(4):887-97. PubMed ID: 7960992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A totally integrated simulation technique for three-field breast treatment using a CT simulator.
Butker EK; Helton DJ; Keller JW; Hughes LL; Crenshaw T; Davis LW
Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1809-14. PubMed ID: 8946378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CT simulation in nodal positive breast cancer.
Horst E; Schuck A; Moustakis C; Schaefer U; Micke O; Kronholz HL; Willich N
Strahlenther Onkol; 2001 Oct; 177(10):511-6. PubMed ID: 11680015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical results of computerized tomography-based simulation with laser patient marking.
Ragan DP; Forman JD; He T; Mesina CF
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1996 Feb; 34(3):691-5. PubMed ID: 8621294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of a laser system for CT software simulation (EXOMIO) in patients with breast cancer.
Strassmann G; Vacha P; Osterhaus T; Battmann A; Richter D; Nashwan K; Neidel HO; Klose KJ; Engenhart-Cabillic R
Strahlenther Onkol; 2004 Sep; 180(9):597-600. PubMed ID: 15378191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CT simulator: a new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy: Part 2. Clinical application.
Nagata Y; Nishidai T; Abe M; Takahashi M; Okajima K; Yamaoka N; Ishihara H; Kubo Y; Ohta H; Kazusa C
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Mar; 18(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 2318684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A virtual matching technique for three-field breast irradiation using 3-D planning.
Strauss JB; Kirk MC; Chen SS; Shah AP; Gielda BT; Chu JC; Turian JV; Dickler A
Phys Med; 2009 Dec; 25(4):212-5. PubMed ID: 19345600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The use of computed tomography in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast cancer. How does conventional radiotherapy planning compare with virtual?
Bauduceau O; Bollet MA; Pons P; Kirova YM; Fayolle M; Zervoudis S; Campana F
J BUON; 2008; 13(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 18555473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. CT-based simulation with laser patient marking.
Ragan DP; He T; Mesina CF; Ratanatharathorn V
Med Phys; 1993; 20(2 Pt 1):379-80. PubMed ID: 8497227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a CT simulator in radiotherapy treatment planning for breast conserving therapy.
Hiraoka M; Mitsumori M; Okajima K; Nagata Y; Takahashi M; Nakata M; Abe M
Radiother Oncol; 1994 Oct; 33(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 7878209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of simulator-CT versus simulator fluoroscopy versus surface marking based radiation treatment planning: a prospective study by three-dimensional evaluation.
Suhag V; Kaushal V; Yadav R; Das BP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Jan; 78(1):84-90. PubMed ID: 16165239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity modulation to improve dose uniformity with tangential breast radiotherapy: initial clinical experience.
Kestin LL; Sharpe MB; Frazier RC; Vicini FA; Yan D; Matter RC; Martinez AA; Wong JW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2000 Dec; 48(5):1559-68. PubMed ID: 11121662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of three-dimensional planning for axillary node coverage with breast-conserving radiation therapy: early experience.
Smitt MC; Goffinet DR
Radiology; 1999 Jan; 210(1):221-6. PubMed ID: 9885612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Full integration of the beam's eye view concept into computerized treatment planning.
McShan DL; Fraass BA; Lichter AS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1990 Jun; 18(6):1485-94. PubMed ID: 2370198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed simulationgraphy: concept and method of clinical application.
Ogino T; Hanai K; Egawa S; Takano H
Radiat Med; 1990; 8(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 2374826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Future directions in 3-dimensional radiation treatment planning.
Rosenman J
Oncology (Williston Park); 1993 Nov; 7(11):97-104, 107; discussion 107-8. PubMed ID: 8280580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reduction of radiation-induced xerostomia in nasopharyngeal carcinoma using CT simulation with laser patient marking and three-field irradiation technique.
Nishioka T; Shirato H; Arimoto T; Kaneko M; Kitahara T; Oomori K; Yasuda M; Fukuda S; Inuyama Y; Miyasaka K
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Jul; 38(4):705-12. PubMed ID: 9240636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning from limited anatomical information: is Sim-CT sufficient for planning women with breast cancer receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Trouncer RJ; Rowbottom CG; Budgell GJ; Mackay RI; Magee B
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2005 Aug; 17(5):343-51. PubMed ID: 16097565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of multiplanar reformatted radiographic and digitally reconstructed radiographic images for planning conformal radiation therapy.
Das IJ; McGee KP; Fein DA; Milito SJ; Shammo G; Curran WJ; Coia LR
Radiographics; 1995 Nov; 15(6):1483-8. PubMed ID: 8577971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
