These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22227776)
1. Spectral characteristics of the PhNR in the full-field flash electroretinogram of normals and glaucoma patients. Kremers J; Jertila M; Link B; Pangeni G; Horn FK Doc Ophthalmol; 2012 Apr; 124(2):79-90. PubMed ID: 22227776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG. Rangaswamy NV; Shirato S; Kaneko M; Digby BI; Robson JG; Frishman LJ Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28. PubMed ID: 17898309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma. Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability. Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The photopic negative response of the blue-on-yellow flash-electroretinogram in glaucomas and normal subjects. Wakili N; Horn FK; Jünemann AG; Nguyen NX; Mardin CY; Korth M; Kremers J Doc Ophthalmol; 2008 Sep; 117(2):147-54. PubMed ID: 18273658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On and off responses of the photopic fullfield ERG in normal subjects and glaucoma patients. Horn FK; Gottschalk K; Mardin CY; Pangeni G; Jünemann AG; Kremers J Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 21267627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-color pupillometry in enhanced S-cone syndrome caused by NR2E3 mutations. Collison FT; Park JC; Fishman GA; Stone EM; McAnany JJ Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 132(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 27033713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure. Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationship between stimulus size and different components of the electroretinogram (ERG) elicited by flashed stimuli. Nittmann MG; Aher AJ; Kremers J; Tzekov R Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):213-231. PubMed ID: 33063285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram. Frishman L; Sustar M; Kremers J; McAnany JJ; Sarossy M; Tzekov R; Viswanathan S Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 29855761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Photopic negative response versus pattern electroretinogram in early glaucoma. Preiser D; Lagrèze WA; Bach M; Poloschek CM Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Feb; 54(2):1182-91. PubMed ID: 23307968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram. Binns AM; Mortlock KE; North RV Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 21243403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Photopic negative response of full-field electroretinography in patients with different stages of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Kirkiewicz M; Lubiński W; Penkala K Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Feb; 132(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 26831670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Harwerth RS; Smith EL Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1124-36. PubMed ID: 10235545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability. Berezovsky A; Karanjia R; Fernandes AG; Botelho GIS; Bueno TLN; Ferraz NN; Sacai PY; Coupland SG; Sadun AA; Salomão SR Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 32681419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rod- versus cone-driven ERGs at different stimulus sizes in normal subjects and retinitis pigmentosa patients. Aher AJ; McKeefry DJ; Parry NRA; Maguire J; Murray IJ; Tsai TI; Huchzermeyer C; Kremers J Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 136(1):27-43. PubMed ID: 29134295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Blue flash ERG PhNR changes associated with poor long-term glycemic control in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. McFarlane M; Wright T; Stephens D; Nilsson J; Westall CA Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Feb; 53(2):741-8. PubMed ID: 22222270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ganglion cell loss in early glaucoma, as assessed by photopic negative response, pattern electroretinogram, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Cvenkel B; Sustar M; Perovšek D Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28567618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term blue light rearing does not affect in vivo retinal function in young rhesus monkeys. Lou L; Frishman LJ; Beach KM; Rajagopalan L; Hung LF; She Z; Smith EL; Ostrin LA Doc Ophthalmol; 2023 Aug; 147(1):45-57. PubMed ID: 36995437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]