These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22228113)

  • 1. Common variants of the resistance mechanism in the Smith machine: analysis of mechanical loading characteristics and application to strength-oriented and hypertrophy-oriented training.
    Arandjelović O
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Feb; 26(2):350-63. PubMed ID: 22228113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Load-velocity relationship 1RM predictions: A comparison of Smith machine and free-weight exercise.
    Hughes LJ; Peiffer JJ; Scott BR
    J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2562-2568. PubMed ID: 32669051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of muscle activation between a Smith machine and free weight bench press.
    Schick EE; Coburn JW; Brown LE; Judelson DA; Khamoui AV; Tran TT; Uribe BP
    J Strength Cond Res; 2010 Mar; 24(3):779-84. PubMed ID: 20093960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The contribution of volume, technique, and load to single-repetition and total-repetition kinematics and kinetics in response to three loading schemes.
    Crewther BT; Cronin J; Keogh JW
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Nov; 22(6):1908-15. PubMed ID: 18841079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Strength training at high versus low external resistance in older adults: effects on muscle volume, muscle strength, and force-velocity characteristics.
    Van Roie E; Delecluse C; Coudyzer W; Boonen S; Bautmans I
    Exp Gerontol; 2013 Nov; 48(11):1351-61. PubMed ID: 23999311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Calculation of force and power during bench throws using a Smith machine: the importance of considering the effect of counterweights.
    Kobayashi Y; Narazaki K; Akagi R; Nakagaki K; Kawamori N; Ohta K
    Int J Sports Med; 2013 Sep; 34(9):820-4. PubMed ID: 23459856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of exercise order with barbell and machine modalities on upper body volume load and myoelectric activity.
    Bezerra ES; Schoenfeld BJ; Paz G; Farias DA; Sakugawa RL; Vieira I; Rossato M; Miranda H
    Sports Biomech; 2020 Dec; 19(6):778-791. PubMed ID: 30274549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of muscle activity and 1-RM strength of three chest-press exercises with different stability requirements.
    Saeterbakken AH; van den Tillaar R; Fimland MS
    J Sports Sci; 2011 Mar; 29(5):533-8. PubMed ID: 21225489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Kinetic comparison of free weight and machine power cleans.
    Jones RM; Fry AC; Weiss LW; Kinzey SJ; Moore CA
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Nov; 22(6):1785-9. PubMed ID: 18978627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing one repetition maximum and three repetition maximum between conventional and eccentrically loaded deadlifts.
    Bishop A; DeBeliso M; Sevene TG; Adams KJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2014 Jul; 28(7):1820-5. PubMed ID: 24276311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of testing strategy on expression of upper-body work capacity and one-repetition maximum prediction after resistance training in college-aged men and women.
    Mayhew JL; Brechue WF; Smith AE; Kemmler W; Lauber D; Koch AJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Oct; 25(10):2796-807. PubMed ID: 21904231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determination of optimal loading during the power clean, in collegiate athletes.
    Comfort P; Fletcher C; McMahon JJ
    J Strength Cond Res; 2012 Nov; 26(11):2970-4. PubMed ID: 22190161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of load-velocity relationships in two bench press variations: weight stack machine vs Smith machine.
    Rodiles-Guerrero L; Pareja-Blanco F; León-Prados JA
    Sports Biomech; 2022 Nov; 21(10):1147-1159. PubMed ID: 32336207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kinematic and kinetic analysis of maximal velocity deadlifts performed with and without the inclusion of chain resistance.
    Swinton PA; Stewart AD; Keogh JW; Agouris I; Lloyd R
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Nov; 25(11):3163-74. PubMed ID: 21993040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimal load maximizes the mean mechanical power output during upper extremity exercise in highly trained soccer players.
    Jandacka D; Uchytil J
    J Strength Cond Res; 2011 Oct; 25(10):2764-72. PubMed ID: 21912283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of accentuated eccentric loading on strength, muscle hypertrophy, and neural adaptations in trained individuals.
    Brandenburg JP; Docherty D
    J Strength Cond Res; 2002 Feb; 16(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 11834103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of resistance training with moderate vs heavy loads on muscle mass and strength in the elderly: A meta-analysis.
    Csapo R; Alegre LM
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2016 Sep; 26(9):995-1006. PubMed ID: 26302881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mathematical model of neuromuscular adaptation to resistance training and its application in a computer simulation of accommodating loads.
    Arandjelović O
    Eur J Appl Physiol; 2010 Oct; 110(3):523-38. PubMed ID: 20544357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of whole-body low-intensity resistance training with slow movement and tonic force generation on muscular size and strength in young men.
    Tanimoto M; Sanada K; Yamamoto K; Kawano H; Gando Y; Tabata I; Ishii N; Miyachi M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2008 Nov; 22(6):1926-38. PubMed ID: 18978616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The load that maximizes the average mechanical power output during jump squats in power-trained athletes.
    Baker D; Nance S; Moore M
    J Strength Cond Res; 2001 Feb; 15(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 11708714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.