These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22228132)
1. Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification. Bernardi D; Pellegrini M; Di Michele S; Tuttobene P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Gentilini M; Ciatto S Radiol Med; 2012 Jun; 117(4):519-28. PubMed ID: 22228132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Lazarus E; Mainiero MB; Schepps B; Koelliker SL; Livingston LS Radiology; 2006 May; 239(2):385-91. PubMed ID: 16569780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of Interradiologist Agreement Regarding Mammographic Breast Density Classification Using the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas. Ekpo EU; Ujong UP; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1119-23. PubMed ID: 26999655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms. Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inter-observer agreement according to three methods of evaluating mammographic density and parenchymal pattern in a case control study: impact on relative risk of breast cancer. Winkel RR; von Euler-Chelpin M; Nielsen M; Diao P; Nielsen MB; Uldall WY; Vejborg I BMC Cancer; 2015 Apr; 15():274. PubMed ID: 25884160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of mammographic density patterns: reproducibility and concordance among scales. Garrido-Estepa M; Ruiz-Perales F; Miranda J; Ascunce N; González-Román I; Sánchez-Contador C; Santamariña C; Moreo P; Vidal C; Peris M; Moreno MP; Váquez-Carrete JA; Collado-García F; Casanova F; Ederra M; Salas D; Pollán M; BMC Cancer; 2010 Sep; 10():485. PubMed ID: 20836850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation. Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammography: interobserver variability in breast density assessment. Ooms EA; Zonderland HM; Eijkemans MJ; Kriege M; Mahdavian Delavary B; Burger CW; Ansink AC Breast; 2007 Dec; 16(6):568-76. PubMed ID: 18035541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in determining breast density according to the fifth edition of the BI-RADS® Atlas. Pesce K; Tajerian M; Chico MJ; Swiecicki MP; Boietti B; Frangella MJ; Benitez S Radiologia (Engl Ed); 2020; 62(6):481-486. PubMed ID: 32493654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement. Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Breast density (BD) assessment with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): Agreement between Quantra™ and 5th edition BI-RADS Ekpo EU; Mello-Thoms C; Rickard M; Brennan PC; McEntee MF Breast; 2016 Dec; 30():185-190. PubMed ID: 27769015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification. Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Abdullah N; Mesurolle B; El-Khoury M; Kao E Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):665-72. PubMed ID: 19567644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience. Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BI-RADS Category Assignments by GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and Google Bard: A Multilanguage Study. Cozzi A; Pinker K; Hidber A; Zhang T; Bonomo L; Lo Gullo R; Christianson B; Curti M; Rizzo S; Del Grande F; Mann RM; Schiaffino S Radiology; 2024 Apr; 311(1):e232133. PubMed ID: 38687216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]