163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22228166)
1. Viscoelastic assessment of anal canal function using acoustic reflectometry: a clinically useful technique.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Telford KJ; Hosker GL; Lose G; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2012 Feb; 55(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 22228166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new reproducible technique providing physiological assessment of anal sphincter function.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Telford KJ; Hosker GL; Lose G; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2011 Sep; 54(9):1122-8. PubMed ID: 21825892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of Anal Acoustic Reflectometry in the Evaluation of Men With Passive Fecal Leakage.
Hornung BR; Telford KJ; Carlson GL; Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Kiff ES
Dis Colon Rectum; 2017 May; 60(5):521-526. PubMed ID: 28383452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study of anal acoustic reflectometry and anal manometry in the assessment of faecal incontinence.
Hornung BR; Mitchell PJ; Carlson GL; Klarskov N; Lose G; Kiff ES
Br J Surg; 2012 Dec; 99(12):1718-24. PubMed ID: 23132420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anorectal function in patients with complete rectal prolapse. Differences between continent and incontinent individuals.
Roig JV; Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Fernández C; Villoslada C; García-Armengol J; Hinojosa J
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Nov; 90(11):794-805. PubMed ID: 9866412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodologic Validation of a Faster Pelvic Floor Test: Two Randomized Studies in Anal Acoustic Reflectometry.
Nicholson JE; Klarskov N; Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Telford KJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2019 May; 62(5):623-630. PubMed ID: 30540659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anal acoustic reflectometry: a new technique for assessing anal sphincter function.
Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Hosker G; Lose G; Kiff ES
Colorectal Dis; 2010 Jul; 12(7):692-7. PubMed ID: 20070337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of delivery on anorectal function in women with and women without anal incontinence--a prospective study.
Højberg KE; Hundborg HH; Ryhammer AM; Laurberg S
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2003 Feb; 14(1):38-45; discussion 45. PubMed ID: 12601515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urethral pressure reflectometry and pressure profilometry in healthy volunteers and stress urinary incontinent women.
Klarskov N; Lose G
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):807-12. PubMed ID: 18551560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anal acoustic reflectometry predicts the outcome of percutaneous nerve evaluation for faecal incontinence.
Hornung BR; Carlson GL; Mitchell PJ; Klarskov N; Lose G; Telford KJ; Kiff ES
Br J Surg; 2014 Sep; 101(10):1310-6. PubMed ID: 25043271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Maximum anal sphincter strength measured by the solid sphere test and anal pressure profiles.
Haadem K; Dahlström JA; Ling L
Eur J Surg; 1992 Sep; 158(9):499-502. PubMed ID: 1358219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Anal incontinence in patients with rectal neoplasms previous to surgical intervention].
DeMiguel M; Ortíz H; Garrido JR; Morales G; Armendáriz P
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1996 Jan; 88(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 8615997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Continuous vs stepwise anal acoustic reflectometry: An improved technique for physiological measurement of anal sphincter function?
Heywood NA; Nicholson JE; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
Neurourol Urodyn; 2020 Jan; 39(1):447-454. PubMed ID: 31770467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Placement of a fine-bore rectal balloon catheter in the anal canal does not affect anal sphincter pressures: improving our understanding of physiological function with anal acoustic reflectometry.
Heywood NA; Sharma A; Kiff ES; Klarskov N; Telford KJ
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Nov; 22(11):1626-1631. PubMed ID: 32770704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Anal sphincter function and recto-anal continence].
Kuhlbusch R; Erckenbrecht JF
Leber Magen Darm; 1987 Jul; 17(3):143-9. PubMed ID: 3613812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anorectal function investigations in incontinent and continent patients. Differences and discriminatory value.
Felt-Bersma RJ; Klinkenberg-Knol EC; Meuwissen SG
Dis Colon Rectum; 1990 Jun; 33(6):479-85; discussion 485-6. PubMed ID: 2351000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter.
Savoye G; Leroi AM; Denis P; Michot F
Br J Surg; 2000 May; 87(5):586-9. PubMed ID: 10792314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anal canal pressure and motility after ileoanal anastomosis.
O'Connell PR; Stryker SJ; Metcalf AM; Pemberton JH; Kelly KA
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1988 Jan; 166(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 3336814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Combining the strength-duration curve of the external anal sphincter with manometry for the assessment of faecal incontinence.
Monk DN; Mills P; Jeacock J; Deakin M; Cowie A; Kiff ES
Br J Surg; 1998 Oct; 85(10):1389-93. PubMed ID: 9782022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can digital examination substitute anorectal manometry for the evaluation of anal canal pressures?
Buch E; Alós R; Solana A; Roig JV; Fernández C; Díaz F
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 1998 Feb; 90(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 9567642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
