These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Maximum likelihood supertrees. Steel M; Rodrigo A Syst Biol; 2008 Apr; 57(2):243-50. PubMed ID: 18398769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Implementing and testing Bayesian and maximum-likelihood supertree methods in phylogenetics. Akanni WA; Wilkinson M; Creevey CJ; Foster PG; Pisani D R Soc Open Sci; 2015 Aug; 2(8):140436. PubMed ID: 26361544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Supertrees Based on the Subtree Prune-and-Regraft Distance. Whidden C; Zeh N; Beiko RG Syst Biol; 2014 Jul; 63(4):566-81. PubMed ID: 24695589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Phylogenetic supertree reveals detailed evolution of SARS-CoV-2. Li T; Liu D; Yang Y; Guo J; Feng Y; Zhang X; Cheng S; Feng J Sci Rep; 2020 Dec; 10(1):22366. PubMed ID: 33353955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Problems with supertrees based on the subtree prune-and-regraft distance, with comments on majority rule supertrees. Goloboff PA; Szumik CA Cladistics; 2016 Feb; 32(1):82-89. PubMed ID: 34732022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Increasing data transparency and estimating phylogenetic uncertainty in supertrees: Approaches using nonparametric bootstrapping. Moore BR; Smith SA; Donoghue MJ Syst Biol; 2006 Aug; 55(4):662-76. PubMed ID: 16969942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. COSPEDTree: COuplet Supertree by Equivalence Partitioning of Taxa Set and DAG Formation. Bhattacharyya S; Mukherjee J IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(3):590-603. PubMed ID: 26357270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Total evidence, average consensus and matrix representation with parsimony: what a difference distances make. Levasseur C; Lapointe FJ Evol Bioinform Online; 2007 Feb; 2():1-5. PubMed ID: 19455197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The evolution of supertrees. Bininda-Emonds OR Trends Ecol Evol; 2004 Jun; 19(6):315-22. PubMed ID: 16701277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robustness of topological supertree methods for reconciling dense incompatible data. Willson SJ IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 19179699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Building supertrees: an empirical assessment using the grass family (Poaceae). Salamin N; Hodkinson TR; Savolainen V Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):136-50. PubMed ID: 11943096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Supertree construction in the genomic age. Bininda-Emonds OR Methods Enzymol; 2005; 395():745-57. PubMed ID: 15865993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Triplet supertree heuristics for the tree of life. Lin HT; Burleigh JG; Eulenstein O BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S8. PubMed ID: 19208181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Fast local search for unrooted Robinson-Foulds supertrees. Chaudhary R; Burleigh JG; Fernández-Baca D IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(4):1004-13. PubMed ID: 22431553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Invariant transformers of Robinson and Foulds distance matrices for Convolutional Neural Network. Tahiri N; Veriga A; Koshkarov A; Morozov B J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2022 Aug; 20(4):2250012. PubMed ID: 35798684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. L.U.St: a tool for approximated maximum likelihood supertree reconstruction. Akanni WA; Creevey CJ; Wilkinson M; Pisani D BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 15():183. PubMed ID: 24925766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]