These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22229589)

  • 1. Classical conditioning mechanisms can differentiate between seeing and doing in rats.
    Kutlu MG; Schmajuk NA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):84-101. PubMed ID: 22229589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The loss of latent inhibition across compound conditioning.
    Holmes NM; Harris JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):328-39. PubMed ID: 19594279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latent inhibition and compound conditioning: a reply to Holmes and Harris (2009).
    Schmajuk N; Kutlu MG
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 21517202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Re-assessing causal accounts of learnt behavior in rats.
    Burgess KV; Dwyer DM; Honey RC
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22486754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attentional and error-correcting associative mechanisms in classical conditioning.
    Schmajuk N
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Jul; 35(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 19594285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Experimental challenges to theories of classical conditioning: application of an attentional model of storage and retrieval.
    Schmajuk NA; Larrauri JA
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2006 Jan; 32(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 16435961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The special status of actions in causal reasoning in rats.
    Leising KJ; Wong J; Waldmann MR; Blaisdell AP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2008 Aug; 137(3):514-27. PubMed ID: 18729713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanisms underlying retarded emergence of conditioned responding following inhibitory training: evidence for the comparator hypothesis.
    Schachtman TR; Brown AM; Gordon EL; Catterson DA; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Jul; 13(3):310-22. PubMed ID: 3612027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing excitatory backward and forward conditioning.
    Chang RC; Stout S; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2004 Jan; 57(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 14690847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Overshadowing of subsequent events and recovery thereafter.
    Burger DC; Mallemat H; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 10881606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Trial spacing is a determinant of cue interaction.
    Stout SC; Chang R; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):23-38. PubMed ID: 12561131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Extinction arouses attention to the context in a behavioral suppression method with humans.
    Nelson JB; Lamoureux JA; León SP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Jan; 39(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 23316978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recovery from blocking between outcomes.
    Wheeler DS; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2005 Oct; 31(4):467-76. PubMed ID: 16248732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of contextual associations in producing the partial reinforcement acquisition deficit.
    Miguez G; Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):40-51. PubMed ID: 21707201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responding to a conditioned stimulus depends on the current associative status of other cues present during training of that specific stimulus.
    Miller RR; Barnet RC; Grahame NJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1992 Jul; 18(3):251-64. PubMed ID: 1619393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The comparator hypothesis of conditioned response generation: manifest conditioned excitation and inhibition as a function of relative excitatory strengths of CS and conditioning context at the time of testing.
    Kasprow WJ; Schachtman TR; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1987 Oct; 13(4):395-406. PubMed ID: 3668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Associative status of the training context determines the effectiveness of compound extinction.
    Witnauer JE; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Jan; 38(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 22229586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditioned inhibition produced by extinction-mediated recovery from the relative stimulus validity effect: a test of acquisition and performance models of empirical retrospective revaluation.
    Blaisdell AP; Miller RR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2001 Jan; 27(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 11199514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prevention of the degraded-contingency effect by signalling training trials.
    Gunther LM; Miller RR
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2000 May; 53(2):97-119. PubMed ID: 10881603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. US habituation, like CS extinction, produces a decrement in conditioned fear responding that is NMDA dependent and subject to renewal and reinstatement.
    Storsve AB; McNally GP; Richardson R
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2010 May; 93(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 20074653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.