These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22229779)

  • 21. Two methods for teachers' measurement of impulse control.
    Simpson ML
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Jun; 56(3):823-9. PubMed ID: 6877968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Harnessing the need for immediate gratification: cognitive reconstrual modulates the reward value of temptations.
    Magen E; Gross JJ
    Emotion; 2007 May; 7(2):415-28. PubMed ID: 17516818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Vividness of the future self predicts delinquency.
    van Gelder JL; Hershfield HE; Nordgren LF
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jun; 24(6):974-80. PubMed ID: 23592649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Performance in temporal discounting tasks by people with intellectual disabilities reveals difficulties in decision-making and impulse control.
    Willner P; Bailey R; Parry R; Dymond S
    Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2010 Mar; 115(2):157-71. PubMed ID: 20441385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Multiple sclerosis reduces sensitivity to immediate reward during decision making.
    Grippa E; Sellitto M; Scarpazza C; Mattioli F; di Pellegrino G
    Behav Neurosci; 2017 Aug; 131(4):325-336. PubMed ID: 28714718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Personal relative deprivation, delay discounting, and gambling.
    Callan MJ; Shead NW; Olson JM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):955-73. PubMed ID: 21875231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Rational temporal predictions can underlie apparent failures to delay gratification.
    McGuire JT; Kable JW
    Psychol Rev; 2013 Apr; 120(2):395-410. PubMed ID: 23458085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Persistence motives in irrational decisions to complete a boring task.
    Halkjelsvik T; Rise J
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 Jan; 41(1):90-102. PubMed ID: 25355585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sweet future: fluctuating blood glucose levels affect future discounting.
    Wang XT; Dvorak RD
    Psychol Sci; 2010 Feb; 21(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 20424042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Ability to delay gratification and BMI in preadolescence.
    Bruce AS; Black WR; Bruce JM; Daldalian M; Martin LE; Davis AM
    Obesity (Silver Spring); 2011 May; 19(5):1101-2. PubMed ID: 21151018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Self-interest without selfishness: the hedonic benefit of imposed self-interest.
    Berman JZ; Small DA
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1193-9. PubMed ID: 22965945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Maintenance of delay of gratification by four chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes): the effects of delayed reward visibility, experimenter presence, and extended delay intervals.
    Beran MJ; Evans TA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):315-24. PubMed ID: 16978800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. When is it adaptive to be patient? A general framework for evaluating delayed rewards.
    Fawcett TW; McNamara JM; Houston AI
    Behav Processes; 2012 Feb; 89(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 21920413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trust matters: Seeing how an adult treats another person influences preschoolers' willingness to delay gratification.
    Michaelson LE; Munakata Y
    Dev Sci; 2016 Nov; 19(6):1011-1019. PubMed ID: 26799458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Delay of gratification in old age: assessment, age-related effects, and clinical implications.
    Drobetz R; Maercker A; Forstmeier S
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2012 Feb; 24(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 22170087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mobile technology habits: patterns of association among device usage, intertemporal preference, impulse control, and reward sensitivity.
    Wilmer HH; Chein JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1607-1614. PubMed ID: 26980462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Probability and delay discounting of hypothetical sexual outcomes.
    Lawyer SR; Williams SA; Prihodova T; Rollins JD; Lester AC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Jul; 84(3):687-92. PubMed ID: 20385215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On the benign qualities of behavioral disinhibition: because of the prosocial nature of people, behavioral disinhibition can weaken pleasure with getting more than you deserve.
    van den Bos K; Van Lange PA; Lind EA; Venhoeven LA; Beudeker DA; Cramwinckel FM; Smulders L; van der Laan J
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Oct; 101(4):791-811. PubMed ID: 21574725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The ability of children to delay gratification in an exchange task.
    Steelandt S; Thierry B; Broihanne MH; Dufour V
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):416-25. PubMed ID: 22153324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Lesions to the subthalamic nucleus decrease impulsive choice but impair autoshaping in rats: the importance of the basal ganglia in Pavlovian conditioning and impulse control.
    Winstanley CA; Baunez C; Theobald DE; Robbins TW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2005 Jun; 21(11):3107-16. PubMed ID: 15978020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.