These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22230059)

  • 1. Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor.
    Galletti JG; Pförtner T; Bonthoux FF
    J Refract Surg; 2012 Mar; 28(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 22230059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Jardim D; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr; 117(4):673-9. PubMed ID: 20138369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combining ocular response analyzer metrics for corneal biomechanical diagnosis.
    Ruiseñor Vázquez PR; Delrivo M; Bonthoux FF; Pförtner T; Galletti JG
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Sep; 29(9):596-602. PubMed ID: 23848186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Ocular response analyzer measurements in keratoconus with normal central corneal thickness compared with matched normal control eyes.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    J Refract Surg; 2011 Mar; 27(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 20481414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Screening of forme fruste keratoconus with the ocular response analyzer.
    Schweitzer C; Roberts CJ; Mahmoud AM; Colin J; Maurice-Tison S; Kerautret J
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 May; 51(5):2403-10. PubMed ID: 19907025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis.
    Touboul D; Bénard A; Mahmoud AM; Gallois A; Colin J; Roberts CJ
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2011 Dec; 37(12):2144-50. PubMed ID: 21978610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship of Structural Characteristics to Biomechanical Profile in Normal, Keratoconic, and Crosslinked Eyes.
    Viswanathan D; Kumar NL; Males JJ; Graham SL
    Cornea; 2015 Jul; 34(7):791-6. PubMed ID: 25850703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Corneal biomechanical evaluation in healthy thin corneas compared with matched keratoconus cases.
    Fontes BM; Ambrósio R; Velarde GC; Nosé W
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2011; 74(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 21670900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of corneal biomechanics in pre and post-refractive surgery and keratoconic eyes by Ocular Response Analyser.
    Shah S; Laiquzzaman M
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):129-32; quiz 151. PubMed ID: 19233712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of Goldmann, ocular response analyser, Pascal and TonoPen XL tonometry in keratoconic and normal eyes.
    Mollan SP; Wolffsohn JS; Nessim M; Laiquzzaman M; Sivakumar S; Hartley S; Shah S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2008 Dec; 92(12):1661-5. PubMed ID: 18757471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal deformation signal waveform analysis in keratoconic versus post-femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis eyes after statistical correction for potentially confounding factors.
    Zarei-Ghanavati S; Ramirez-Miranda A; Yu F; Hamilton DR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 22440435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Efficacy of corneal tomography parameters and biomechanical characteristic in keratoconus detection.
    Ahmadi Hosseini SM; Abolbashari F; Niyazmand H; Sedaghat MR
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Feb; 37(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 23910506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and confocal microscopy findings in normal and keratoconic eyes.
    Hurmeric V; Sahin A; Ozge G; Bayer A
    Cornea; 2010 Jun; 29(6):641-9. PubMed ID: 20458238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the reference surface shape for discriminating between normal corneas, subclinical keratoconus, and keratoconus.
    Smadja D; Santhiago MR; Mello GR; Krueger RR; Colin J; Touboul D
    J Refract Surg; 2013 Apr; 29(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 23557226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical properties of keratoconus suspect eyes.
    Saad A; Lteif Y; Azan E; Gatinel D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jun; 51(6):2912-6. PubMed ID: 20042662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical evaluation of cornea in topographically normal relatives of patients with keratoconus.
    Kara N; Altinkaynak H; Baz O; Goker Y
    Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 22677642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.
    Ortiz D; Piñero D; Shabayek MH; Arnalich-Montiel F; Alió JL
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1371-5. PubMed ID: 17662426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corneal thickness- and age-related biomechanical properties of the cornea measured with the ocular response analyzer.
    Kotecha A; Elsheikh A; Roberts CR; Zhu H; Garway-Heath DF
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5337-47. PubMed ID: 17122122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sensitivity and specificity of posterior corneal elevation measured by Pentacam in discriminating keratoconus/subclinical keratoconus.
    de Sanctis U; Loiacono C; Richiardi L; Turco D; Mutani B; Grignolo FM
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1534-9. PubMed ID: 18405974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discriminant Value of Custom Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Derivatives in Forme Fruste Keratoconus.
    Luz A; Lopes B; Hallahan KM; Valbon B; Fontes B; Schor P; Dupps WJ; Ambrósio R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 164():14-21. PubMed ID: 26743618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.