BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22230203)

  • 1. An exploratory randomized controlled trial comparing telephone and hospital follow-up after treatment for colorectal cancer.
    Beaver K; Campbell M; Williamson S; Procter D; Sheridan J; Heath J; Susnerwala S
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Oct; 14(10):1201-9. PubMed ID: 22230203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nurse-led telephone follow-up and an educational group programme after breast cancer treatment: results of a 2 × 2 randomised controlled trial.
    Kimman ML; Dirksen CD; Voogd AC; Falger P; Gijsen BC; Thuring M; Lenssen A; van der Ent F; Verkeyn J; Haekens C; Hupperets P; Nuytinck JK; van Riet Y; Brenninkmeijer SJ; Scheijmans LJ; Kessels A; Lambin P; Boersma LJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(7):1027-36. PubMed ID: 21237636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can a tailored telephone intervention delivered by volunteers reduce the supportive care needs, anxiety and depression of people with colorectal cancer? A randomised controlled trial.
    White VM; Macvean ML; Grogan S; D'Este C; Akkerman D; Ieropoli S; Hill DJ; Sanson-Fisher R
    Psychooncology; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1053-62. PubMed ID: 21769989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nurse led telephone follow up in ovarian cancer: a psychosocial perspective.
    Cox A; Bull E; Cockle-Hearne J; Knibb W; Potter C; Faithfull S
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2008 Dec; 12(5):412-7. PubMed ID: 18845479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Satisfaction with nurse-led telephone follow up for low to intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy. A comparative study.
    Leahy M; Krishnasamy M; Herschtal A; Bressel M; Dryden T; Tai KH; Foroudi F
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2013 Apr; 17(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 22608878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is a nurse-led telephone intervention a viable alternative to nurse-led home care and standard care for patients receiving oral capecitabine? Results from a large prospective audit in patients with colorectal cancer.
    Craven O; Hughes CA; Burton A; Saunders MP; Molassiotis A
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2013 May; 22(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 23527965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multicenter randomized trial of centralized nurse-led telephone-based care coordination to improve outcomes after surgical resection for colorectal cancer: the CONNECT intervention.
    Young JM; Butow PN; Walsh J; Durcinoska I; Dobbins TA; Rodwell L; Harrison JD; White K; Gilmore A; Hodge B; Hicks H; Smith S; O'Connor G; Byrne CM; Meagher AP; Jancewicz S; Sutherland A; Ctercteko G; Pathma-Nathan N; Curtin A; Townend D; Abraham NS; Longfield G; Rangiah D; Young CJ; Eyers A; Lee P; Fisher D; Solomon MJ
    J Clin Oncol; 2013 Oct; 31(28):3585-91. PubMed ID: 24002519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The process and outcomes of a nurse-led colorectal cancer follow-up clinic.
    McFarlane K; Dixon L; Wakeman CJ; Robertson GM; Eglinton TW; Frizelle FA
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 May; 14(5):e245-9. PubMed ID: 22182050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Economic evaluation of four follow-up strategies after curative treatment for breast cancer: results of an RCT.
    Kimman ML; Dirksen CD; Voogd AC; Falger P; Gijsen BC; Thuring M; Lenssen A; van der Ent F; Verkeyn J; Haekens C; Hupperets P; Nuytinck JK; van Riet Y; Brenninkmeijer SJ; Scheijmans LJ; Kessels A; Lambin P; Boersma LJ
    Eur J Cancer; 2011 May; 47(8):1175-85. PubMed ID: 21257305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving outcomes after myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial evaluating effects of a telephone follow-up intervention.
    Hanssen TA; Nordrehaug JE; Eide GE; Hanestad BR
    Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 14(3):429-37. PubMed ID: 17568244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial.
    Grunfeld E; Fitzpatrick R; Mant D; Yudkin P; Adewuyi-Dalton R; Stewart J; Cole D; Vessey M
    Br J Gen Pract; 1999 Sep; 49(446):705-10. PubMed ID: 10756611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient experiences of nurse-led telephone follow-up following treatment for colorectal cancer.
    Williamson S; Chalmers K; Beaver K
    Eur J Oncol Nurs; 2015 Jun; 19(3):237-43. PubMed ID: 25529937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Telephone care as an adjunct to routine medical follow-up. A negative randomized trial.
    Welch HG; Johnson DJ; Edson R
    Eff Clin Pract; 2000; 3(3):123-30. PubMed ID: 11182960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The comparison of effectiveness of two modalities of mental health nurse follow-up programmes for female outpatients with depression in Taipei, Taiwan.
    Hsiao FH; Yang TT; Chen CC; Tsai SY; Wang KC; Lai YM; Tsai CJ; Chang WY
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jun; 16(6):1141-50. PubMed ID: 17518889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An exploratory study of the follow-up care needs of patients treated for colorectal cancer.
    Beaver K; Latif S; Williamson S; Procter D; Sheridan J; Heath J; Susnerwala S; Luker K
    J Clin Nurs; 2010 Dec; 19(23-24):3291-300. PubMed ID: 20964750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomized controlled evaluation of specialist nurse education following accident and emergency department attendance for acute asthma.
    Levy ML; Robb M; Allen J; Doherty C; Bland JM; Winter RJ
    Respir Med; 2000 Sep; 94(9):900-8. PubMed ID: 11001084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How acceptable is a referral and telephone-based outcall programme for men diagnosed with cancer? A feasibility study.
    Livingston P; White V; Hayman J; Hill D
    Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2006 Dec; 15(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 17177905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A randomized trial to improve the quality of treatment for panic and generalized anxiety disorders in primary care.
    Rollman BL; Belnap BH; Mazumdar S; Houck PR; Zhu F; Gardner W; Reynolds CF; Schulberg HC; Shear MK
    Arch Gen Psychiatry; 2005 Dec; 62(12):1332-41. PubMed ID: 16330721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A national evaluation of specialists' clinics in primary care settings.
    Bowling A; Bond M
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Apr; 51(465):264-9. PubMed ID: 11458477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of secondary prevention clinics on health status in patients with coronary heart disease: 4 year follow-up of a randomized trial in primary care.
    Murchie P; Campbell NC; Ritchie LD; Deans HG; Thain J
    Fam Pract; 2004 Oct; 21(5):567-74. PubMed ID: 15367480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.